Remove Arizona Remove Immigration Remove Misdemeanor
article thumbnail

Justices asked to review Arizona’s life-without-parole sentencing scheme for youths

SCOTUSBlog

Under Arizona law, the trial judge could have sentenced Bassett for each count to either life in prison without the possibility of parole or life in prison with the possibility of “release” after 25 years. Arizona had passed a law a decade earlier rendering anyone convicted of homicide, including murder, ineligible for parole.

article thumbnail

US Supreme Court indefinitely stays Texas law criminalizing illegal entry from abroad

JURIST

In late February, a federal judge issued a preliminary injunction preventing the law from being enforced, noting that the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution and US Supreme Court precedent place immigration matters under federal jurisdiction. Justice Alito stayed the Fifth Circuit’s order on March 4 without explaining his reasoning.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

March 2018 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

DHS had waived the requirements of NEPA, the Endangered Species Act, the Coastal Zone Management Act, and other laws pursuant to Section 102 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996. Arizona Court Ordered Production of Climate Scientists’ Emails Under Arizona’s Public Records Law.

Court 40
article thumbnail

Texas governor signs law criminalizing illegal entry from abroad

JURIST

The bill creates a misdemeanor offense for violation of the statute and a felony crime for multiple offenses. It also empowers state magistrate judges to hear immigration cases and issue removal orders in addition to giving law enforcement the responsibility of ensuring compliance with the law.

article thumbnail

August 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Ninth Circuit Affirmed Rejection of NEPA Challenges to Immigration Policies. The plaintiffs—identified as environmentalists, environmental groups, natural resource conservation groups, and cattle ranchers—alleged, among other things, that the immigration actions resulted in increased greenhouse gas emissions. United States.

Court 40
article thumbnail

February argument calendar includes immigration, voting-rights cases

SCOTUSBlog

Innovation Law Lab , a challenge to the Trump administration’s “remain in Mexico” policy, which allows the Department of Homeland Security to return immigrants seeking asylum to Mexico while they wait for an asylum hearing in U.S. immigration courts. Democratic National Committee and Arizona Republican Party v. California (Feb.