This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
An Arizona court Friday granted Kari Lake, former Arizona gubernatorial candidate, permission to inspect ballots from the Arizona general election on November 8. In its ruling, the court noted, “The law in Arizona does not permit an election challenge to proceed based solely upon a vague sense of unease.”
Russ Wiles, Arizona Republic, Arizona Republic Interviews Diane L. Drain about Arizona homestead protection and exposure to creditors. Homeowners who refinance their mortgag es could lose protections from debt collectors and other creditors under a bill that’s quietly making its way through the Arizona Legislature.
The program is only available to voters in certain swing states, including Georgia, Arizona, and Pennsylvania. ” There may be a grey area in the statute, but since a lawsuit has been filed, the court can provide a clear answer on the legality of the petition. He’s paying them to sign the petition.”
Maricopa County, Arizona, Sheriff’s Bidding Requirements at a Sheriff’s Execution Sale of a Judgment Debtor’s “Homestead” Residence. The Sheriff will schedule an execution sale of the Homestead Residence to enforce the Judgment only if all of the legal requirements discussed below are satisfied (“Sheriff’s Execution Sale”). By Larry O.
A reputable agency will also limit its work to collecting debts within the statute of limitations, which varies by state. Being within the statute of limitations means that the debt is not too old, and the creditor can still pursue it legally. Drain - Phoenix Arizona Bankruptcy Attorney. Agencies That Buy Debt.
I have been in the legal field for over 30 years and a paralegal going on eight years. Preparing legal memorandums is one of my favorite things to do. After I finished researching, I prepare a legal memorandum (using the IRAC rules) for my attorneys detailing my results. is to know your local rules and statutes.
As I survey the legal profession broadly, and the world of legal tech and innovation specifically, I see uncertainty and inertia. It is as if we are serving time in a legal tech limbo. After all, it was a good year for the legal tech industry. Overall, the legal tech industry saw unprecedented growth.
Democratic National Committee and Arizona Republican Party v. Democratic National Committee concerning two Arizona state laws. The Voting Rights Act, a landmark federal civil rights statute , was enacted in 1965. The court heard arguments in the combined cases of Brnovich v.
Meanwhile, the water level at Lake Powell, the massive reservoir created by the Glen Canyon Dam on the Utah-Arizona border, is at historic lows, threatening its ability to generate power. The federal government and the states of Arizona, Colorado, and Nevada, which intervened below, successfully sought Supreme Court review.
During a question-and-answer session following her speech, I asked her about the stalled efforts to bring about reform in California and what the Supreme Court could do to move the issue forward, particularly in light of the leading roles taken by the supreme courts of Arizona and Utah to bring about reforms in those states.
Hans von Spakovsky is a senior legal fellow and manager of the Election Law Reform Initiative at The Heritage Foundation. This is not something contemplated by the text of the statute or its legislative history. Share This article is the final entry in a symposium on the court’s decision in Brnovich v. Department of Justice.
Established in 1871, the San Carlos Apache Indian Reservation spans 2,800 square miles in southeastern Arizona and is home to nearly 11,000 people. Under the federal statute governing these contracts, tribes can then keep third-party insurance revenue so long as they spend it on health care.
The statute includes a list of information the government must include – most notably, the time and place of the removal hearing. A noncitizen who does not attend a removal proceeding can be ordered removed as long as written notice has been provided to him under the statute. Tori Madden) The question before the justices on Jan.
As I survey the legal profession broadly, and the world of legal tech and innovation specifically, I see uncertainty and inertia. It is as if we are serving time in a legal tech limbo. After all, it was a good year for the legal tech industry. Overall, the legal tech industry saw unprecedented growth.
But local governments operate under varying legal parameters, and the Ninth Circuit decision has different implications for different building electrification requirements depending on location, legal landscape, and policy approach. This post is not expressing a legal opinion on Ithaca’s code.) Clean Air Act, not EPCA.
Arizona does not provide a basis for civil damages under 42 U.S.C. Share On Thursday, the Supreme Court released its opinion in Vega v. Tekoh , in which a 6-3 court held that a violation of Miranda v.
Arizona allows a plaintiff to sue for money damages under 42 U.S.C. Tekoh may create a seismic shift in American constitutional criminal procedure, as the court’s resolution of the lawsuit here could take an axe to the legal and cultural oak known as Miranda warnings. Stated thusly? The issue is deceptive, reading as a mere mundanity.
However, the statute also says such PPP loans will be available only if the SBA Administrator sends a letter to the Director of the Executive Office for United States Trustee acquiescing to PPP loans in bankruptcy. It will take years, if ever, to uncover what this latest bill (5,600 pages of legal mumble-jumble) hides.
The FCC’s Media Bureau issued an Order granting the license renewal of an FM station is Arizona for only one year, instead of the normal eight year period, because the station had been silent for extended periods. For further details on how the Bureau resolved these matters, see the Bureau’s decision available here.
Supreme Court yesterday upheld the constitutionality of Pennsylvania’s corporate registration statute, even though it requires out-of-state corporations registering to do business within the state to consent to all-purpose (general) personal jurisdiction. This post is by Maggie Gardner, a professor of law at Cornell Law School.
Arizona is one of the most significant Supreme Court decisions in American criminal procedure. Dickerson put the kibosh on an unconstitutional federal statute that, effectively, sought to overrule Miranda. Share Miranda v. 3) Goodbye, Miranda ? 4) Proximate cause says what? 5) What about the costs?
Maricopa County Superior Court of Arizona ruled Wednesday that Arizona’s abortion ban after 15 weeks of pregnancy was unconstitutional and permanently enjoined Arizona employees from enforcing the abortion ban. They argued that there is no legal remedy to address these harms.
A story in Houston has everything you would want in a legal controversy: a murder, a mysterious figure known only as “D”, a missing Bengal tiger named India and even Carole Baskin of Tiger King fame. The Lacey Act and other federal wildlife statutes could be charged for such conduct.
The focus is on a law from 1864, established shortly after Arizona was designated as a US territory by the Senate and decades before it attained statehood. The regulation has remained largely unchanged since 1865, and the near-total abortion ban was codified into Arizona state law in the early 20th century. The 2022 ruling Dobbs v.
An Arizona state appeals court Friday blocked enforcement of a 1901 abortion ban, which bans all abortions unless the procedure is necessary to save a pregnant person’s life. Planned Parenthood said, with the stay in place, Arizona clinics will now resume abortion procedures.
Arizona Residential Eviction Actions Procedures – effective July 15, 2021. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED beginning on the effective date of this Order, all other eviction cases shall be processed solely under Arizonastatutes and rules, except as provided herein. Drain - Phoenix Arizona Bankruptcy Attorney. PLEADINGS.
A group of Arizona plaintiffs filed a lawsuit in federal court on Tuesday seeking to block implementation of two provisions of an abortion law set to go into effect in September. The personhood provision, on the other hand, “alters the entire Arizona Revised Statutes.”
The Second Circuit agreed with the district court that the plaintiff lacked standing because he failed to allege an injury in fact since he “never explained why he had any legal right to have the document distributed.” EPA’s brief is due December 15. National Environmental Development Association’s Clean Air Project v. Williams , No.
In a statement, the Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry said it was “prepared to perform its legal obligation and commence the execution process as part of the legally imposed sentence, regardless of method selected.”
The government argues that although enablement inquiry requires some factual findings, it also includes questions of law, and the Federal Circuit properly set aside a jury verdict favoring Amgen on legal grounds. Navajo Nation and Arizona v. Arizona , 21-1553. The cases are Department of the Interior v. Navajo Nation.
The argument was notable because a surprising group of justices appeared genuinely to struggle with the legal issue at the heart of the case – repeatedly calling it “rather odd,” “very odd,” “close,” and “really a tough case.” The question raised in Shinn v. Roberts replied, “That’s a lot of prescience to ascribe to Congress.”.
McDonough , a case that the court already rescheduled seven times last term, and which involves the construction of a statute providing disability pay for members of the military. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, by a divided vote , deferred to the Department of Veterans Affairs construction of the statute under Chevron U.S.A.,
Before trial, the district court rejected Struve’s argument that the officers had violated the Fourth Amendment in pulling him over without reasonable suspicion because they could not tell whether he was texting or using his cellphone legally. Lamoureux v. Bethany Hospice and Palliative Care LLC. Disclosure : Goldstein & Russell, P.C.,
Arizona: In this death penalty case, the justices will decide whether the Arizona Supreme Court’s ruling that a state rule of criminal procedure barred the defendant, John Cruz, from obtaining relief is an adequate and independent state-law ground for the judgment against him. .
The key is to place appropriate legal distance between guns and people in various stages of crisis whose words or actions preclude their access to these instruments of death. Several prohibitions enumerated in a key section of federal firearms law (18 USC 922(g)) can lead to the arrest and confiscation of the firearm.
Texas authorities say they have the right to keep it under civil forfeiture statutes. In addition to challenging the perverse financial incentives built into civil forfeiture, the class action lawsuit highlights problems with police notions of “consent”—an important legal question when officers take property using civil forfeiture.
Fradella is a Professor in the School of Criminology and Criminal Justice at Arizona State University, where he also holds an affiliate appointment as a professor of law. His research focuses on the legal aspects of criminal justice. He earned a B.A. in psychology, a master’s in forensic science, a J.D., in justice studies.
State of Arizona on Tuesday, banning Arizona from excluding gender-affirming care in state health insurance plans. Judge Marquez evaluated the consent decree and affirmed that it met the appropriate legal standards for class action settlements. Toomey alleged he was denied gender-affirming care to aid in his transition.
Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have been placed on OFAC’s Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC’s determination that one or more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. . maritime cabotage. .
Judge Julius Richardson concurred in the judgment, asking the Supreme Court to clarify the legal tests governing the inquiry. The 4th Circuit held that that provision unambiguously confers a right that is privately enforceable under Section 1983, and that Planned Parenthood is a qualified provider. Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C. ,
Two consolidated cases from Arizona that will be argued at the court on Wednesday – Shinn v. I’ll discuss the facts of each case and how they come before the court, but first some background is necessary to understand the legal issue the cases will address. David Martinez Ramirez. In other words, it’s a feature, not a bug.
Woods , 21-144 , involves a nonprofit ministry that operates a free legal-aid clinic. The clinic is overtly religious; in addition to legal issues, clinic staff discuss Jesus with clients and sometimes pray with them. The ever-vigilant solicitor general also noted that the court also granted review in Arizona v.
The group is funded in part by Leonard Leo, the Federalist Society co-chair who has raised hundreds of millions of dollars for conservative legal campaigns and helped pick or confirm each of the courts six conservative justices. Congress did the same thing here, the FCC says.
This essay explores what “defund the police” means to leading criminologists, community organizers and legal scholars. There were instances, such as a hot spot program in Mesa, Arizona from August 2008 to March 2009, where crime displacement happened. This is a legal process. Berkeley, Ca., The National Conversation.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content