Remove Arkansas Remove Contract Remove Court Remove Laws
article thumbnail

Arkansas Law Prohibiting Manufacturer 340B Contract Pharmacy Restrictions Upheld by 8th Circuit

FDA Law Blog

By Faraz Siddiqui — As drug manufacturers battle the Health Resources and Services Administration (“HRSA”) in federal courts over the role of 340B contract pharmacies, an Eighth Circuit decision to uphold a 2021 Arkansas law may render those cases inconsequential in that state. 23-92-604(c)(1), (2) (Act 1103).

article thumbnail

US Government launches antitrust suit against Live Nation Entertainment, claiming business practices that harm artists and fans

JURIST

The US Government alleges that Live Nation violated § 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act , an 1890 US antitrust law that prescribes the rules of free competition and prohibits unfair monopolies. § Live Nation also imposed long-term, exclusive contracts – ranging from three to 14 years – on significant portions of tickets available.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Opinion analysis: Court rejects challenge to states’ authority to regulate pharmacy reimbursements

SCOTUSBlog

Rutledge involves an Arkansas statute of that sort, which has three salient provisions. Tracking the Supreme Court’s standard framework for ERISA pre-emption cases, Sotomayor separately considers whether the Arkansas statute has an “impermissible connection” with ERISA plans and whether it “refers to” ERISA.

Statute 81
article thumbnail

ACLU asks US Supreme Court to overturn Arkansas law requiring pledge not to boycott Israel

JURIST

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the ACLU of Arkansas Thursday filed a petition with the US Supreme Court challenging an Arkansas law requiring state contractors to sign a pledges stating they will not boycott Israel.

Laws 162
article thumbnail

D.C. Circuit Sides with Manufacturers in Latest 340B Contract Pharmacy Case

FDA Law Blog

Kirschenbaum — Last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that Section 340B of the Public Health Service Act does not prohibit pharmaceutical manufacturers from imposing conditions on the distribution of discounted drugs to covered entities in the program. By Sophia R. Gaulkin & Alan M.

article thumbnail

From Chanel v. The RealReal to Cases Over Custom Nikes, Lawsuits to Watch in 2022

The Fashion Law

In late November, Peloton – fresh out of a 5-year-long apparel deal with Lululemon – filed a declaratory judgment action in New York federal court, seeking an order that it is not infringing a number of Lululemon’s design patents and trade dress by way of its new apparel offerings. The Bridal Battle.

article thumbnail

US federal judge allows Oklahoma ban on gender-affirming care for minors to take effect

JURIST

The plaintiffs challenged the law, SB 613 , on several constitutional grounds. First, they alleged the law’s ban on gender-affirming care exclusively for minors is a form of age discrimination and a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause.

Contract 223