Remove Arkansas Remove Contract Remove Court Remove Legal
article thumbnail

Arkansas Law Prohibiting Manufacturer 340B Contract Pharmacy Restrictions Upheld by 8th Circuit

FDA Law Blog

By Faraz Siddiqui — As drug manufacturers battle the Health Resources and Services Administration (“HRSA”) in federal courts over the role of 340B contract pharmacies, an Eighth Circuit decision to uphold a 2021 Arkansas law may render those cases inconsequential in that state. 23-92-604(c)(1), (2) (Act 1103).

article thumbnail

From Chanel v. The RealReal to Cases Over Custom Nikes, Lawsuits to Watch in 2022

The Fashion Law

2021 saw the start of a headline-making legal scuffle between Peloton and Lululemon. Lululemon followed up shortly thereafter with a suit of its own, which it in California federal court , arguing that the exercise bike-maker is on the hook for design patent and trade dress infringement in connection with its sale of “copycat” athleticwear.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

US federal judge allows Oklahoma ban on gender-affirming care for minors to take effect

JURIST

Judge Hein rejected this claim by citing numerous cases to summarize ways in which “American law” restricted minors from entering contracts, being held criminally liable and purchasing certain goods. The ruling shows a growing divide in the federal court system on how to approach gender-affirming care bans.

Contract 223
article thumbnail

Guest Post: Third-Party Litigation Funding: Disclosure to Courts, Congress, and the Executive

Patently O

That’s because current disclosure of litigation funding relies on a patchwork of state law, court rules, self-reporting, FOIA requests, leaks to journalists, and funding pitches. As such, the Federal District Court of Delaware has recently found itself at the center of this high-stakes debate about transparency and the purpose of the courts.

article thumbnail

Federal appeals court strikes down Arkansas law barring state contracts with companies that boycott Israel

JURIST

The US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled Friday that an Arkansas law prohibiting state contracts with companies that refuse to pledge against boycotts on Israel is an unconstitutional violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments. The school was incorporated into the University of Arkansas System in 2017.

Contract 206
article thumbnail

Morning Docket: 06.21.23

Above The Law

Law360 ] * Fund manager explains that the legal industry is in trouble because all of his rich buddies are using ChatGPT to write all their contracts. Washington Post ] * Interesting analysis of how the nature of the student impacts the success of online legal education. It's becoming a popular show this year.

Finance 98
article thumbnail

October 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Federal Court in Rhode Island Allowed Failure-to-Adapt Claims to Proceed. The federal district court for the District of Rhode Island for the most part denied a motion to dismiss a citizen suit asserting that Shell Oil Products US and other defendants (Shell) failed to prepare a terminal in Providence for the impacts of climate change.

Court 72