This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
“Arkansas Supreme Court chief justice rejects colleagues orders, citing constitutional authority; Chief Justice Karen Baker also denounces an employment agreement between five justices and a judicial employee she attempted to fire last week”: Tess Vrbin of Arkansas Advocate has this report , along with an article headlined “ Arkansas (..)
The US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Tuesday held that Arkansas’ three-drug execution protocol does not violate the Eighth Amendment’s protection against cruel and unusual punishment. Asa Hutchinson , was initially brought by death-row prisoners seeking to avoid the execution protocol in Arkansas.
The Christian Ministerial Alliance joined three voters Tuesday to file a lawsuit against the Arkansas State Board of Election Commissioners and Arkansas Secretary of State John Thurston over alleged voter dilution arising from Arkansas’ 2021 redistricting plan. Thurston and Simpson v.
Brooks blocked Arkansas on Saturday from enforcing Act 372 , a law that penalizes librarians for “furnishing harmful item[s] to minors.” ” The case is in the US District Court for the Western District of Fayetteville Division. Arkansas is not the first state this year to pass a law restricting public library books.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the ACLU of Arkansas Thursday filed a petition with the US Supreme Court challenging an Arkansas law requiring state contractors to sign a pledges stating they will not boycott Israel.
The US Justice Department (DOJ) announced Tuesday that a grand jury indicted two former Arkansas sheriff’s deputies with federal civil rights offense for using excessive force during an arrest. The victim also sued the former deputies in federal court shortly after the incident occurred.
2012), the Supreme Court of Arkansas implied that a judge changing a prior evidentiary ruling on the eve of trial can be grounds for a new trial, even if the new ruling. In Bedell v. Williams, 386 S.W.3d 3d 493 (Ark.
The US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on Monday ruled against a tool often used to enforce voter protections, finding that private groups and individuals are not permitted to bring lawsuits under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA), which prohibits race-based voter suppression.
“Arkansas Supreme Court chief justice harassed court staff, per human resources report; Report led court administrator in January to inform Chief Justice Baker she was no longer allowed near certain offices”: Tess Vrbin of Arkansas Advocate has this report.
“Court: Arkansas can’t ban treatment of transgender kids.” Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued today. The post “Court: Arkansas can’t ban treatment of transgender kids.” ” appeared first on How Appealing.
Similar to its federal counterpart, Arkansas Rule of Evidence 611(c) provides that Leading questions should not be used on the direct examination of a witness except as may be necessary to develop his testimony. Ordinarily leading questions should be permitted.
“Arkansas governor names next secretary of state, two state Supreme Court justices; SOS, solidly conservative Supreme Court appointments are effective Jan. 1, 2025”: Mary Hennigan of Arkansas Advocate has this report.
“Arkansas Supreme Court orders chief justice to hand over HR report in dispute with administrator; Chief Justice Karen Baker has until noon Tuesday to give the court information about her actions in the Justice Building on Dec. 4-5, 2024”: Tess Vrbin of Arkansas Advocate has this report.
On the other end of the spectrum are states like Arkansas , which does not require background checks, ban assault weapons, and imposes only limited restrictions on who is eligible to acquire a gun. Some take it further and argue that the Second Amendment should be repealed.
“Arkansas Supreme Court chief justice says dispute over her authority could lead to litigation; Baker again says she hopes to pick new Administrative Office of the Courts director”: Tess Vrbin of Arkansas Advocate has this report.
“Arkansas Supreme Court administrator asks chief justice to stay away, pending disciplinary review; Request is latest stumble in rocky start for Chief Justice Karen Baker”: Sonny Albarado of Arkansas Advocate has this report.
“Arkansas judges recognize service of 10 judiciary employees targeted by Supreme Court chief justice; Judicial Council sides with Supreme Court majority that declared the firing attempt null and void”: Tess Vrbin of Arkansas Advocate has this report.
“Arkansas Times loses challenge of state’s Israel boycott law”: Max Brantley of Arkansas Times has this report on an en banc ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued today.
“Arkansas Supreme Court justices spar with chief justice over her authority in rare public meeting; Bakers colleagues express frustration over inconsistencies in her statements”: Tess Vrbin of Arkansas Advocate has this report. ArkansasJudiciary has posted the video of the meeting on YouTube at this link.
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday in Goldman Sachs Group v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System. This securities class action relies on the “fraud-on-the-market” theory, which was validated in the 1988 Supreme Court decision, Basic Inc.
“Arkansas Supreme Court majority blocks chief justices attempt to fire 10 judiciary employees; Chief Justice Karen Baker does not have the authority to fire certain employees, five justices said, calling her actions retaliatory”: Tess Vrbin of Arkansas Advocate has this report.
The decision means the case will be sent back down to the district court to determine if the ADC policy violates Muslim prisoners’ religious rights. A three-judge panel for the Eighth Circuit issued a unanimous opinion that the district court used the wrong standard in its ruling.
“ACLU asks supreme court to overturn Arkansas’ anti-boycott law against Israel; The civil rights group says the law is in conflict with a 40-year-old supreme court ruling that boycotts are protected speech”: Chris McGreal of The Guardian (UK) has this report.
The US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled Monday that Missouri is not barred from enforcing a state law that criminalizes misleading advertisements of vegan food products as containing meat. Because of this, the appeals court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction but allowed the suit to proceed to trial on the merits.
The US Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously upheld an Arkansas law setting prescription drug reimbursement rates for pharmacies. The 2015 Arkansas law requires pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) in the state to pay reimbursements to pharmacies at or above the costs of obtaining generic prescription drugs.
“Tom Cotton to AG Garland: ‘Thank God you are not on the Supreme Court’; Arkansas senator called Garland ‘shameful’ for his directive related to violence, threats and intimidation of school board officials.” ” Ronn Blitzer of Fox News has this report.
The state attorneys generals of Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska and South Carolina alleged in a federal Missouri court that Biden’s federal student loan forgiveness plan is unauthorized and poses economic harm to working class individuals. Both lawsuits ask the court to immediately halt implementation of the plan.
The Third Texas Court of Appeals Wednesday upheld a trial court’s decision to temporarily block the state from proceeding with an investigation into the parents of a transgender teenager. However, the court of appeals denied the state’s request, noting a lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
District Court Judge Jason Marks found that SB 99 would most likely have the “opposite effect” when it comes to protecting minors and that the “purported purpose…is disingenuous.” Similar bans on gender-affirmative medical care have been deemed unconstitutional in states such as Arkansas and Texas.
Share The Supreme Court on Monday sent a shareholder class-action lawsuit against Goldman Sachs back to a lower court for a closer look at whether alleged misstatements by the bank were too general to have affected its stock price. Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote the opinion of the court. In its opinion in Goldman Sachs Group v.
We were curious as to the status of online court help to the self-represented litigants as a good 2021 year-end wrapup article for the CTB? Colorado courts have a dedicated page for "Efiling for Non-Attorneys" at: [link] There are links to forms and video/written tutorials listed. We share what we found below.
An Arkansas lawyer who was arrested for carrying ballot petitions at a state bar meeting in June 2024 has reached an out-of-court settlement that calls…
Those arrested included men from 13 states, including Michigan, Texas, Alabama, Colorado, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, South Dakota, Washington, Oregon, Illinois, Arkansas and Missouri. The men have until June 30 to contact the court and set a date for their court appearances. Each man bonded out of the Kootenai County Jail for $300.
The United States Supreme Court has held that a criminal defendant's Due Process rights are violated when the State destroys or fails to preserve potentially exculpatory evidence only if the State acted in bad faith. So, is it automatically bad.
The need to consider the value of the book as a whole, or its literary, scientific or political value, is part of the obscenity test outlined in the 1973 US Supreme Court case Miller v California. The Court found that where work is not considered obscene, it is constitutionally protected expression under the First Amendment.
Dozens of states, including Arkansas, Arizona, and Nevada, have joined the lawsuit, claiming that Live Nation has also violated rules on unfair practices and bans on monopolies under state law. Live Nation has yet to file a response within the court.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
100 
Let's personalize your content