Remove Attorney Remove California Remove Prima Facie Case
article thumbnail

California Supreme Court: prisoners must get lawyer when challenging convictions for killings committed by others

JURIST

The California Supreme Court held Monday that prisoners are entitled to a lawyer before a trial court can consider their record of conviction in determining whether the prisoners may challenge their murder convictions for killings committed by others. The new law in question was California Senate Bill No.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court takes two cases — including one on its own motion — at yesterday’s conference — Part II

At the Lectern

’ The court concluded, however, that the petition didn’t make a prima facie case — “the allegations of the petition do not support the conclusion that the language cited by petitioner is racially discriminatory or that it reflects racial bias or animus.”

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

No straight grants at yesterday’s conference

At the Lectern

Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero has cited the California Racial Justice Act ( here and here ) as one of the “important landmark new laws” that is “impacting [the court’s] workflow.” The court yesterday denied review and a depublication request in one case involving that legislation, Mosby v.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court affirms death penalty, with a Batson dissent

At the Lectern

and California Supreme Court decisions holding it unconstitutional for an attorney to racially discriminate in peremptorily challenging prospective jurors. The superior court ruled the defendant had not made even a prima facie case of discrimination and thus did not require the prosecutor to justify his challenge.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court will resolve conflict about co-tenancy leasing requirements (and about punctuation?)

At the Lectern

Assuring that “[t]he Goddess of justice is not wearing a black armband today weeping for the California Constitution,” a 2-1 Second District, Division Six, published opinion said “[i]t is our Constitutional obligation to affirm a judgment, where a more favorable outcome will not result upon reversal.” 29; see also Cal.

Court 60
article thumbnail

The drop in straight grants is indeed not permanent — Part I

At the Lectern

In June we wrote the California Racial Justice Act ( here and here ) “is a good candidate to be the next big thing on the courts docket. The Supreme Court had asked for an informal response concerning “whether petitioner has set forth a prima facie case for relief on his claim under the Racial Justice Act.”

article thumbnail

Over two-justice Batson dissent, Supreme Court affirms death penalty

At the Lectern

Supreme Court’s Batson decision and the California Supreme Court’s Wheeler decision establish that it’s unconstitutional for an attorney to racially discriminate in peremptorily challenging prospective jurors. The prosecution used peremptory challenges to excuse five Black women from the jury.