Attorney Cause of Action Minnesota 
Patently O
JANUARY 4, 2024
I believe that Winston & Strawn will eventually prevail based upon a fair use defense, but it is still an embarrassing situation for the firm and attorneys involved. The role of attribution is also receiving increasing focus as attorneys begin to rely more heavily on AI outputs for their legal documents.
Patently O
MAY 17, 2021
Its sole employee is Robert Babayi–a patent attorney practicing in Washington DC who has apparently never visited the Texas office. Thus, we have contacts and threats of litigation directed toward a resident of California; and these threats relate directly to the eventual cause of action. PerDiemCo owns a number of U.S.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
DECEMBER 11, 2020
In Minnesota v. the defendants filed their opposition to Minnesota’s remand motion (November 9). Petition Filed Challenging Water Quality Certification for Minnesota Crude Oil Pipeline. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (In re 401 Certification for Line 3 Replacement Project) , No. Chevron Corp. 20-cv-1636 (D.
SCOTUSBlog
JULY 1, 2021
Doe , 20-1374 , concerns whether Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (and Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act, which incorporates its enforcement mechanisms) provides a disparate-impact cause of action for plaintiffs alleging disability discrimination, and whether such claims can be based on facially neutral health-plan terms.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
SEPTEMBER 10, 2021
Federal Court Stayed Remand Order in Minnesota’s Climate Case Against Fossil Fuel Industry, Denied Attorney Fees. The federal district court for the District of Minnesota stayed its order remanding Minnesota’s climate change lawsuit against the fossil fuel industry. Minnesota v. Exxon Mobil Corp. , 20, 2021), No.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
JULY 2, 2021
The District of Utah held that the lease suspensions merely maintained the status quo and therefore were not major federal actions subject to NEPA; the conservation groups therefore lacked standing. Minnesota Court of Appeals Upheld State Approvals for Enbridge Crude Oil Replacement Pipeline. Minnesota v. Living Rivers v.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
124 
Let's personalize your content