Constitutional Law Reporter

MARCH 21, 2022

Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit erred in denying the Kentucky attorney general’s motion to intervene on the commonwealth’s behalf in litigation concerning Kentucky House Bill 454, the state’s controversial abortion law. EMW agreed to dismiss claims against the attorney general without prejudice.

Laws 52

Laws Attorney Litigation Litigating 52

Constitutional Law Reporter

OCTOBER 18, 2021

.: Through more than two years of litigation, the Secretary of Kentucky’s Cabinet for Health and Family Services led the state’s legal defense of its law prohibiting abortions in which an unborn child is dismembered while still alive. Over a dissent, the Sixth Circuit refused to allow the Attorney General to defend Kentucky law.

Attorney 59

Attorney Constitutional Law Lawyer Lawyers 59

Constitutional Law Reporter

NOVEMBER 11, 2021

The other potential blockbuster of the week, which involves a legal challenge to a Kentucky abortion law, appears likely to be resolved on procedural grounds in favor of the state’s Attorney General. The post SCOTUS Hears Oral Arguments in Four Cases appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter.

Attorney 59

Attorney Constitutional Law Statute Court 59

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 29, 2022

The trial transcript includes Tyler’s statement to the court: “I wanted to put on the record that my attorneys are using the defense that I don’t agree with. … Kentucky , which allows for retroactive effect of new rules in cases that are not final. Instead, Tyler seeks to bring his claim under Griffith v. Ballance v. United States.

Lawyer 83

Lawyer Lawyers Court Court Rules 83

JonathanTurley

FEBRUARY 5, 2021

Over the last four years, we have seen an alarming trend of law professors and legal experts discarding constitutional and due process commitments to support theories for the prosecution or impeachment of Donald Trump or his family. ” It goes to the most fundamental principles of justice in our legal system.

Legal 57

Legal Legal Court Laws 57

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 13, 2022

In Harlan’s case, the story arc that first attracted me was the notion of posthumous vindication – how a man who went so far out on a limb in his time could land so comfortably in the mainstream of legal thought. Much of Holmes’ reputation rests on his role in First Amendment law, for instance, an area where Harlan’s legacy is negligible.

Court 123

Court Education Government Legal 123