This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Can a convicted murderer sue the District Attorney under Section 1983 to force him to test potentially exonerating DNA evidence? This dispute turns, in part, on whether the District Attorney's refusal to test the DNA deprives the defendant of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. NewYork, 198 U.
note : Please welcome Renee Knake Jefferson back to the pages of Above the Law. Subscribe to her Substack, Legal Ethics Roundup, here. Welcome to what captivates, haunts, inspires, and surprises me every week in the world of legal ethics. 2025 NYC Rule of Law Rally 2025 by David Lat is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Attorney for the District of New Jersey Alina Habba charged McIver with a felony under Title 18, United States Code, Section 111(a)(1). denounced it as a “political weaponization” of the legal system. This column appeared in the NewYork Post. Dan Goldman (D.,
How Trumps Upheaval is Reshaping Your Legal Career By Chere B. Initially, we envisioned a lighthearted discussion on emerging job trends in the legal field where opportunities were growing and how professionals could position themselves for success. Will You Survive? Today, I want to share that message with you.
Nadine Strossen , former president of the American Civil Liberties Union “Brilliant and intellectually honest, Jonathan Turley has few peers as a legal scholar today. Barr , former Attorney General and author of the No. 1 NewYork Times bestseller One Damn Thing After Another. Mukasey , former Attorney General and U.S.
Below is my (slightly updated) column in the NewYork Post on three myths being widely repeated in the Biden impeachment inquiry. These false narratives have been eagerly repeated in the media despite lacking legal or factual support. Jonathan Turley is an attorney and professor at George Washington University Law School.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta (D) chimed in, declaring the flight from Florida might be “ State-sanctioned kidnapping.” Justice Department to investigate whether the flights are violations of the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act — a ridiculous legal suggestion.
Nadine Strossen , former president of the American Civil Liberties Union “Brilliant and intellectually honest, Jonathan Turley has few peers as a legal scholar today. Barr , former Attorney General and author of the No. 1 NewYork Times bestseller One Damn Thing After Another. Mukasey , former Attorney General and U.S.
Nadine Strossen , former president of the American Civil Liberties Union “Brilliant and intellectually honest, Jonathan Turley has few peers as a legal scholar today. Barr , former Attorney General and author of the No. 1 NewYork Times bestseller One Damn Thing After Another. Mukasey , former Attorney General and U.S.
In Harlan’s case, the story arc that first attracted me was the notion of posthumous vindication – how a man who went so far out on a limb in his time could land so comfortably in the mainstream of legal thought. Harlan dissented in all those cases. His father, James Harlan , was quite a persona in his own right. Ferguson and other cases.
Share The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on various ideas for Supreme Court reform. Like the last meeting , various legal experts testified and answered questions from commissioners in a series of panels spread throughout the day.
It also highlighted how the Biden Administration and liberal justices were discarding countervailing research inconveniently at odds with their preferred legal conclusion. The Biden administration is challenging Tennessee’s law banning gender-changing drugs and procedures for minors.
The law covers violent crimes, sexual assault, and assault of a child. The law requires that individuals “shall as soon as reasonably possible notify the prosecuting attorney, law enforcement, medical assistance, or other public officials.” I am unaware of such a law in Pennsylvania, but these laws are rarely enforced.
Below is my column in the NewYork Post on the second release of the “Twitter Files.” ” The new material exposes the company’s system of censorship and suppression of disfavored views. Jonathan Turley is an attorney and professor at George Washington University Law School.
There is a troubling report in The NewYork Times of another free speech fight on one of our campuses. Three University of Florida political science professors have told a federal court that the university barred them from assisting plaintiffs in a challenge to the state’s new voting laws. ’s interests.”
Below is my column in the NewYork Post on the growing attacks on those who are challenging the alleged abuses by the FBI and the censorship system on social media. denounced me for offering “legal opinions” without actually working at Twitter. For the rest of us, it would be a brave new nightmare.” Those words from Sen.
Below is my column in the NewYork Post on the recent cancel campaign targeting Associate Justice Clarence Thomas. It was always doubtful that a law school would take the unprecedented step of barring a sitting Supreme Court justice. Jonathan Turley is an attorney and professor at George Washington University Law School.
NewYork: A litigant’s argumentation or introduction of evidence at trial is often deemed to “open the door” to the admission of responsive evidence that would otherwise be barred by the rules of evidence. .: Over a dissent, the Sixth Circuit refused to allow the Attorney General to defend Kentucky law.
The new Disney remake o f The Little Mermaid was criticized by NewYork Times movie critic Wesley Morris for lacking sufficient “kink” and being too safe in order to appease parents. , observed that the movie could not be made today and that activists have squeezed humor out of Hollywood.
A shorter, edited version of this column ran in the NewYork Post ). There is a Fox News report that it was able to confirm an abortion involving a ten-year-old girl in Indiana but could not confirm the other claims. Here is the original column: “Not a whisper.”
Tom would make it with his mother to the United States and ultimately studied law, with a J.D. at NewYork University Law School and his LL.M. degrees in international law from Harvard Law School. It was her son, and the two embraced on the platform. They had survived. I think of the number 3930.
The map by Saul Steinberg showed civilization largely ending at the New Jersey border with a vast wasteland between NewYork and the Pacific Ocean. Recently the editors of the NewYork Times seriously warned that some states likely would outlaw interracial marriage if Roe v. Board of Education could be next.
The co-chairs of the commission, which will complete its report within 180 days of its first public meeting, are Bob Bauer, an NYU law professor who served as White House counsel to President Barack Obama, and Cristina Rodríguez, a Yale Law School professor who served as a deputy assistant attorney general during the Obama administration.
During an illustrious career as a constitutionallaw scholar and a top Supreme Court advocate, Walter Dellinger argued 24 times before the court, including in some of the biggest cases of the past 30 years. Dellinger was a longtime faculty member at Duke Law School, and he founded the appellate practice at O’Melveny & Myers.
We recently discussed the questionable reporting by the NewYork Times concerning the lead prosecutor, but far more serious questions remain if we are going to reach any resolution on protecting journalists, including the question of what is a journalist. This has brought about radical changes. What is a journalist?
Weeks after the election, journalists discovered that the Clinton campaign hid payments for the Steele dossier as “legal fees” among the $5.6 NewYork Times reporter Ken Vogel said at the time that Elias denied involvement in the anti-Trump dossier. million paid to Perkins Coie.
Below is my column in the NewYork Post on the opinion of Judge Aileen Cannon. Indeed, law professors and legal experts are demanding the removal of Cannon for having the temerity to adopt an opposing view of the underlying constitutional claim. Nevertheless, legal experts were incredulous and irate.
NewYork Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan this week became the latest court to impose a gag order on former president Donald Trump with a stinging order that found a history of Trump attacks that threatened the administration of justice. Trump is still able to criticize Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg and Merchan himself.
He is calling for prosecutors to use grand juries to pursue Trump and others in an unrelenting campaign based on unfounded legal theories. Weissmann is now a MSNBC analyst who teaches at a NewYork University. Former campaign aide George Papadopoulos and attorney Alex Van Der Zwaan served sentences.
Christopher Krebs, has filed a lawsuit against Trump attorney Joe diGenova over this controversial joke that Krebs should be “drawn and quartered” and then “shot” for his failures as the former head of U.S. The Court in cases like NewYork Times v. at 510 (quoting NewYork Times, 376 U.
Below is my column in the Daily Beast on the fourth indictment of former President Donald Trump by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. The 98-page indictment from Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis is the legal version of Pollock’s style of throwing paint splatters on canvas as artistic expression.
In response to these atrocities, Attorney Tlaib made several public statements evincing deeply discriminatory, antisemitic views that call into question her character and fitness to practice law.” House of Representatives publicly censured Attorney Tlaib for her statements. However, she was not alone. Prof’l Cond.
Below is my column in the NewYork Post on the vicious attacks being directed at Judge Aileen Cannon as she addresses pre-trial motions in the Florida prosecution of former president Donald Trump. Attorneys be appointed under statute or nominated by the president (and confirmed by the Senate). and Dianne Feinstein (D-Cal.).
Below is my column in the NewYork Post on the expansion of the 14th Amendment theory to attempt to remove Republican candidates for Congress from the ballots. to disqualify members got 63 co-sponsors, all Democrats, including NewYork Reps. Similar legislation from Rep. Cori Bush (D-Mo.) praised the effort then-Sen.
Below is my column in the NewYork Post on yesterday’s oral arguments on presidential immunity. Trump’s best attorney proved to be Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg. If the justices want insight into the implications of denying any immunity, they just need to look north to NewYork City.
Appeals of ballot decisions are pending in Arizona; ballot challenges are in process in Alaska, Maine , NewYork, New Jersey, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, South Carolina, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming. He teaches a course on the Supreme Court and the Constitution. The ruling in Bush v.
The testimony put the controversial demands of NewYorkAttorney General James into sharp relief. Those words from Alice in Wonderland seem the only apt description of the case unfolding in the NewYork courtroom of Justice Arthur F. They did not. It all reminds one of another great work.
Below is my column in the NewYork Post on reports that Special Counsel Robert Hur has finally interviewed President Joe Biden on allegations that he removed and retained classified material going back to his time as a United States senator. It is the type of question that Attorney General Merrick Garland should be eager to answer.
Below is my column in The Messenger on the early struggle of Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis to preserve her strategy of holding a mass 19-person trial over the 2020 election case involving former president Donald Trump. The hearing on the removal gave a glimpse into the case. In Washington, U.S.
” For its part, most of the media portrayed the now-infamous Steele dossier — the original basis for the collusion claims — as true, and the NewYork Times and Washington Post received Pulitzer Prizes for a story that not only has been debunked but shown to be the product of Hillary’s Clinton’s presidential campaign.
Below is my column in the NewYork Post on why the self-described “giddy” White House might want to consider the impact of a loss of one or both houses of Congress. Legally, there are both individuals and institutions that could see significant changes with the new division of power in Washington.
NewYorkAttorney General Letitia James’ announcement last week that her office was “actively investigating the Trump Organization in a criminal capacity” has added to the former president’s legal worries, but the biggest landmine believed to threaten his political future has yet to be detonated. Capitol on Jan.
The standard for defamation for public figures and officials in the United States is the product of a decision over 50 years ago in NewYork Times v. The NewYork Times had run an advertisement referring to abuses of civil rights marchers and the arrest of Martin Luther King Jr. When NewYork Times v.
Today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit will hear oral arguments on a threshold issue in the criminal case against President Donald Trump in NewYork. The case is still pending in the NewYork court system after his sentencing, but President Trump wants the case removed to federal court.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content