This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni on Saturday declared the Supreme Courtdecision in the matter of trying armed civilians in a military court martial as ‘wrong’, stating that the method reinforces the civilian judicial system in defending the lives of people against criminals armed with guns.
“Louisiana would rather not be here,” state attorney J. But this has became life as usual for the states under this Court’s voting cases.” ” The current voting map was created following a 2022 district courtdecision that struck down a previous state congressional map.
But a federal appeals courtruled last year that Gutierrez does not have a legal right to sue, known as standing, to bring federal civil rights claims challenging the constitutionality of the Texas laws governing DNA testing. But that analysis badly misapprehends the law of standing, Gutierrez counters.
He was held in jail pre-trial due to his inability to afford a $1,000 bail, based on the Alabama bail schedule in the Alabama Rules of Criminal Procedure. The lower courtruled in favor of Hester, enjoining the county from imposing cash bail amounts on defendants who could not afford them. Judge Robin S.
.” Kennedy brought the case to the district court claiming the school district violated his First Amendment right of free speech. The district courtruled in favor of the that the school district. Kennedy appealed the district courtdecision to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which upheld the decision.
As is frequently the case when the court denies review in cases that have been relisted repeatedly, denial occasioned dissent, this time from Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch. And once again, Jos Garza, the Travis County district attorney, has filed a brief supporting the petition.
Tax Courtdecision holding that a partnership may exclude interests in a company that it indirectly received sheds light on related IRS guidance, including the proper valuation method for such interests, though the court's application of the method to the facts of this case appears flawed, say attorneys at Kramer Levin.
The paper recognized attorneys in 15 cases. Three of the cases resulted in Supreme Court opinions. One of the three CLAY award Supreme Courtdecisions is Guardianship of Saul H. 5th 93 — “ Missed break premiums count as wages, State Supreme Courtrules.” 2022) 13 Cal.5th 2022) 13 Cal.5th
A Texas state courtruled that the federal law under which Torres brought his suit, the Uniform Services Employment and Re-employment Rights Act , which allows members of the military to sue to remedy employment discrimination based on their service, is unconstitutional. Moriana joins the court’s growing arbitration docket.
Agreeing with the challengers, the lower courts put different parts of the law on hold. New York Attorney General Letitia James then asked the 2nd Circuit to reinstate the law while the litigation proceeds, and the court of appeals granted her request.
786), the Beijing First Intermediate People’s Courtruled to recognize a German court’s bankruptcy ruling based on the principle of reciprocity. 3, where the Beijing Fourth Intermediate People’s Courtruled to recognize and enforce a trademark judgment of the Korean Supreme Court. 99 Trade Co.
Forensic guardianships, which entail wards who are at substantial risk of being questioned by law enforcement officials, are assiduously protected by the law; and they have been further reinforced by Supreme Courtdecisions. Both loopholes are detrimental to the ward when a law enforcement official is not trained in guardianship laws.
This decision is also interesting because it is unlikely, if not impossible, to have foreign judgments recognized and enforced in Thailand. 1, [14] where the Shanghai Third Intermediate People’s Courtruled to recognize the Tokyo District Court’sdecision to commence civil rehabilitation proceedings and the order appointing the supervisor.
The court’s opinion is authored by Justice Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar. and California Supreme Courtdecisions holding it unconstitutional for an attorney to racially discriminate in peremptorily challenging prospective jurors. Justice Goodwin Liu dissents, claiming Batson / Wheeler error, named after U.S.
But in July, Laufer asked the justices to throw out the case, and invalidate the 1st Circuit’s decision in her favor. If the courtruled on the standing question, he seemed to suggest, it would be issuing “an advisory opinion.”
They were in custody but when they asked for an attorney that request was ignored. In 1969 the Supreme Courtruled in Frazier v. Numerous courtdecisions have upheld the investigator’s capacity to verbally misrepresent evidence during an interrogation. ” Denial of Rights or Physical Needs.
That standard, Judge Locher wrote, went beyond the US Supreme Court’s well-established precedent on obscenity for minors. Judge Locher acknowledged that not all books with sexual content are appropriate for every age group and that prior federal courtdecisions could justify restricting explicit material for younger students.
They must be examined by the courts in Kenya for them to gain recognition and to be enforced’ [para 66]. ’ This Case is highly significant, because it extensively addresses the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in Kenya and the principles to be considered by the Kenyan Courts.
Searches for 911 call analysis in national court dockets come up virtually empty too. Dozens of other defense attorneys had similar reactions. He said he helps defense attorneys and prosecutors alike and “the research is designed to find the truth wherever it goes.”. But Gibbons told someone. It’s my life’s work,” he told me.
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a West Virginia federal district court had erred in concluding that it had jurisdiction to consider the coal company Murray Energy Corporation’s and its affiliates’ lawsuit that sought to compel EPA to conduct evaluations of the Clean Air Act’s employment effects. 47641-0-II (Wash.
The US Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear a case brought by the state of Utah seeking to assert state control over 18.5 million acres of federally owned lands, leaving in place a lower courtruling that upheld federal authority.
The appellate court also found that even if the trial court erred, the error was harmless because the State proved both acts beyond a reasonable doubt. Hawaii CourtRuled that Commercial Aquarium Fishing Required Environmental Review. Zepeda , No. 80593-2-I (Wash. A20-1513 (Minn.
The DOJ’s case to overturn the Arizona law rests on a 2013 Supreme Courtdecision, Arizona v. The courtruled the federal 1993 National Voter Registration Act preempted Arizona from requiring proof of citizenship when applicants register to vote with federal forms. Inter Tribal Council, Inc.
The US Supreme Court Monday declined to review the Pennsylvania Supreme Courtruling that overturned entertainer Bill Cosby’s sexual assault conviction. The case was settled, and District Attorney Bruce Castor declined to press criminal charges. The court did not provide any other comment on the case.
Was the Supreme Courtdecision last month overruling Roe v. Wade one of the worst decisions in the 233-year history of the Court? The ruling in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization has been described as such by many judicial commentators and experts in the middle of the spectrum, and a large segment of the U.S.
“I hate to say it’s not rocket science, but in many ways it’s not,” said Breanne Schuster , a staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union. This decision was prompted by a recent Supreme Courtruling in City of Grants Pass v. Johnson , and the impact that this decision may have on the homeless community.
Hill , the Louisiana Supreme Court affirmed a district courtruling that struck down two state statutes — one requiring sex offenders to obtain specialized identification cards (with the words “SEX OFFENDER” in all caps) and the other prohibiting alteration of such identification documents. In Louisiana v. Louisiana v.
There is an interesting fight brewing in Kentucky between Attorney General Daniel Cameron and Gov. Beshear has correctly cited a major victory recently before the Kentucky Supreme Court — an unanimous decision in favor of his authority to issue pandemic orders. Andy Beshear.
That ruling included Henry and Andrew. In June 2016, five months after the Supreme Courtruling, Andrew became the first Louisiana “juvenile” inmate to be released on parole. In November 2021, more than five years after the Supreme Courtruling, Henry was also released on parole. He had served 19 years.
Hirshfeld has the legal power to fulfill the expanded job as required by the Supreme Court’s decision. Guest post by Nina Mendelson , Following one Supreme Courtdecision posing dangers for the integrity of all sorts of agency adjudication, the ongoing litigation in Arthrex v. — Dennis Crouch.
In a 6-3 decision Ex parte Danny Richard Lane , the state’s highest criminal appeals courtruled that Texas’ historical doctrine of “judicial clemency” does not forgive sex offender registration. His criminal defense attorney, however, managed to secure a 10-year plea deal which he accepted in October 2007.
Supreme Court the chance to disapprove the California Supreme Courtdecision in Adolph v. Supreme Court had misinterpreted California law about the viability of representative actions under the Labor Code’s Private Attorneys General Act when representatives’ individual claims are being arbitrated (see here ).
solicitors general – Seth Waxman, representing Glossip, and Paul Clement, representing Oklahoma’s attorney general – will appear before the justices, seeking to persuade them to set aside Glossip’s conviction and death sentence and order a new trial. 9, two former U.S. Sneed had said that he was accidentally prescribed the drug for a cold.
The court also sent Joseph Smith’s case from Alabama’s death row back to the court of appeals for more clarification of the basis for the lower court’sdecision. Alabama had asked the justices to reverse an appeals courtdecision that lifted Smith’s death sentence. 5 until Nov.
“Federal Court Moves to Drastically Weaken Voting Rights Act; The ruling, which is almost certain to be appealed to the Supreme Court, would effectively bar private citizens and civil rights groups from suing under a key provision of the landmark law”: Nick Corasaniti of The New York Times has this report.
And I had their ear, explaining Supreme Courtdecisions on a regular basis over many years. In June, the courtruled in R.G. & Before becoming clerk of the Supreme Court, Stevas was the clerk of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals and worked as an assistant U.S. Harris Funder Homes v.
The family courtdecision was reviewed by Judges Stan Pritzker, John Egan Jr., They admit that the rock was “not addressed by family court or the attorney for the child, the mother’s testimony at the hearing, as well as an exhibit admitted into evidence.” Sharon Aarons, Molly Reynolds Fitzgerald and John Colangelo.
The lower courtruled that such funding of a religious school is unconstitutional. Before the Oklahoma Supreme Court, Oklahoma Attorney General, Gentner Drummond, prevailed in arguing that the charter school board violated state law, the Oklahoma Constitution, and the U.S. Here is the lower courtdecision: St.
Minnesota Supreme Court Declined to Review Claims Regarding Environmental Review for Oil Pipeline. The Minnesota Supreme Court denied petitions for further review of an appellate courtdecision finding all but one aspect of the environmental review for the Enbridge Line 3 oil pipeline project to be adequate.
The approval is in defiance of the US Supreme Courtruling in Allen v. ” Former US Attorney General Eric H. Governor of Alabama Kay Ivey approved a new congressional map Friday, passed by the Alabama legislature during a special session , which designates only one majority-Black district in the state. Holder, Jr.,
Federal Court Stayed Remand Order in Minnesota’s Climate Case Against Fossil Fuel Industry, Denied Attorney Fees. The federal district court for the District of Minnesota stayed its order remanding Minnesota’s climate change lawsuit against the fossil fuel industry. City of Hoboken v. Exxon Mobil Corp. , 2:20-cv-14243 (D.N.J.
Courts too have recognized how seemingly innocuous phrases may convey profane messages. A county court in San Diego, California referred an attorney to the State Bar when counsel, during a hearing, twice directed the phrase “See You Next Tuesday” toward two female attorneys. Grandville Cent.
Trump, and conflicting signals on issues related to firearms and abortion, leading to a series of impactful decisions. Here are some of the most buzzworthy decisions and their far-reaching effects. United States , the Supreme Courtruled that former President Donald J. Presidential Immunity In Trump v.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed, ruling that the 50% tariff was part of an ongoing plan of action that Trump had properly initiated earlier. In early November, the district courtruled that UNC’s use of race in admissions was consistent with Supreme Court precedents.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content