Remove Attorney Remove Court Decisions Remove Iowa Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Court adds seven new cases to the 2025-26 term

SCOTUSBlog

The Trump administration agreed in this case that the Supreme Court should grant review to resolve confusion in the courts of appeals about the proper standard of review. Nessel filed the case in state court in 2019; in December 2021, Enbridge sought to move the case to federal court. In Iowa Pork Producers Association v.

Court 134
article thumbnail

Blockbuster watch: Affirmative action, same-sex weddings, and other big relists

SCOTUSBlog

Moving on to potential blockbusters that don’t explicitly call on the court to overrule precedent. Environmental Protection Agency , 21-454 , is a long-running Clean Water Act dispute that has already been the subject of one major Supreme Court decision. They invoke Rapanos v. relisted after the Jan. 7 conference). Holcombe v.

Court 111
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

October 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

1442, or the civil-rights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. The district court rejected eight grounds for removal, but the Fourth Circuit concluded its appellate jurisdiction was limited to determining whether the companies properly removed the case under the federal-officer removal statute. Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement v.

Court 72
article thumbnail

High Court Gun Ruling Fuels Licensing Debate in States

The Crime Report

A Supreme Court decision Thursday upending a century-old New York State gun licensing restriction has been called a major blow to state gun control interventions across the country. The Court released its opinion in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association (NYSRPA) v.

Court 52
article thumbnail

June 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Supreme Court held that the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it concluded that its review of the remand order in Baltimore’s climate change case against fossil fuel companies was limited to determining whether the defendants properly removed the case under the federal officer removal statute.

Court 45