This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Court of Appeal for the Fifth Circuit blocked an appeal Friday from Texas gun owners and state Attorney General Ken Paxton seeking judicial approval of a Texas gun law that exempts the state from federal firearm silencer regulations. Standing is a doctrine that courts require for an individual’s grievance to be heard.
The Federal Court of Canada delivered a decision on Thursday overturning the federal government’s order to list plastic-manufactured items (PMIs) under Schedule 1 of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act 1999 (CEPA).
The collaborative idea was that Eddings would manufacture the sheaths because Junker did not have that capability. Thus, the court has held that an offer-to-manufacture doesn’t count. In reviewing the letter, the court noted that the terms appeared quite complete. Image below).
Eligibility under Section 101 : American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. 20-1394 (CVSG requested October 4, 2021); Undermining Jury Decisions : Olaf Sööt Design, LLC v. The asserted patent covers a new method of manufacturing an automobile drive-shaft with reduced vibration. The trial court award was affirmed on appeal.
In his conference keynote address , Arun Rao—the Deputy Assistant Attorney General for DOJ’s Consumer Protection Branch—provided an overview of DOJ’s year in FDA enforcement. FTC Supreme Courtdecision stripping FTC of its ability to obtain restitution or disgorgement under Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act.
The decision has wide-ranging implications for FDA’s assertion of discretion in classifying and regulating medical products. As most readers of our blog are aware, the regulatory costs to manufacturers of medical products are much lower if FDA regulates a product as a medical device rather than a drug requiring FDA marketing approval.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district courtdecision that vacated the listing of the Beringia distinct population segment (DPS) of the Pacific bearded seal subspecies as “threatened” under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Climate Litigation Chart (Update #92): FEATURED CASE. Alaska Oil & Gas Association v.
This tit-for-tat directive against Texas SB8 is the latest of the bold moves Newsom has taken and responds directly to the Supreme Courtdecision last week. Newsom has been a roll since convincingly surviving a recall effort against him in September.
James Harlan served in Congress and as Kentucky’s attorney general, and was a devoted follower of Henry Clay, to the point that Clay’s politics and James’ were almost interchangeable. Having lived through Dred Scott , he was deeply conscious of how mistakes by the court could lead to terrible outcomes. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co.
The First District, Division Three, published opinion accepted the Attorney General’s concession that, when the superior court struck an enhancement — imposed under a plea bargain — under 2021’s Senate Bill 483 , the court wrongly failed to hold a full resentencing hearing.
I dont know whether Missouris attorney general reads TLB, but on the eve of trial Missouri changed the legal basis for its hoarding claim from common-law tort to federal and state antitrust law. The district court further concluded that Defendants engaged in monopolistic actions to hoard PPE through both the nationalization of U.S.
Supreme Courtdecision allowing Texas’s ban on most abortion services to remain in place. But if states can now shield their laws from review by the federal courts that compare assault weapons to Swiss Army knives, then California will use that authority to protect people’s lives, where Texas used it to put women in harm’s way.”.
In its stay motion, the Truck Trailer Manufacturers Association (TTMA) argued that the court had already determined that its challenge to the EPA standards was likely to be successful and that the NHTSA standards could not function without the EPA standards. Truck Trailer Manufacturers Association, Inc. 16-1430 (D.C.
Recent Victories The decision from Missouri, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association [ (SIFMA) ] v. Defendant Attorney General Ashcroft had used this case as a political rallying point, attempting to crowd-fund the defense earlier this year, but he declined to appeal.
Supreme Courtsdecision in SEC v. Attorney General (USAG). The latest iteration of proposed Section 27 in S. But then come the newly revised penalties provisions: (4) CIVIL ACTION.In 5) CIVIL PENALTY. Jarkesy, 144 S. Its not unreasonable to assume that the FTC would oppose any request for jury trial given this language.
Supreme Courtsdecision in SEC v. Attorney General (USAG). The latest iteration of proposed Section 27 in S. But then come the newly revised penalties provisions: (4) CIVIL ACTION.In 5) CIVIL PENALTY. Jarkesy, 144 S. Its not unreasonable to assume that the FTC would oppose any request for jury trial given this language.
Federal Court Stayed Remand Order in Minnesota’s Climate Case Against Fossil Fuel Industry, Denied Attorney Fees. The federal district court for the District of Minnesota stayed its order remanding Minnesota’s climate change lawsuit against the fossil fuel industry. City of Hoboken v. Exxon Mobil Corp. , 2:20-cv-14243 (D.N.J.
The court upheld other aspects of the 2018 standards, including the applicable volumes, restrictions on the use of Renewable Identification Numbers for fuel that is exported, and EPA’s accounting for small refinery exemptions. American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers v. EPA remanded the standards but did not vacate the rule.
This time I was able to see the attorneys as they made their arguments to the justices, but I still could not actually see the justices. The court heard arguments from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Danco (a drug manufacturer that only makes mifepristone) and the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (AHM).
She posed scenarios to clarify which actions could be deemed private, such as collaborating with private attorneys to disseminate false election claims or submitting fraudulent elector slates. No decision yet Food and Drug Administration v. Reynolds Vapor Co. In two examples above, Grants Pass and Trump v.
DECISIONS AND SETTLEMENTS. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district courtdecision that vacated the listing of the Arctic ringed seal as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). order setting schedule Mar. 1, 2018; order denying remand and notice re tutorial Feb.
In a fully briefed and argued challenge by regulated companies to an EPA rule implementing the phasedown of hydrofluorocarbons under the American Innovation and Manufacturing (AIM) Act, the D.C. Oral argument was held on April 23. Circuit denied EPAs motion to hold the case in abeyance.
Maryland Appellate Court Allowed Redaction of Attorney General’s Application to Participate in Special Assistant AG Program. The appellate court agreed with the OAG that redacted portions of the application were privileged as “preliminary communications made between a client and its prospective counsel while seeking legal assistance.”
On March 6, Trump directed federal agencies to terminate contracts with Perkins Coie “to the extent permitted by law,” to limit the firm’s 1,200 attorneys access to federal buildings and employees, and to halt all security clearances. These decisions are not just legal or financial. Constitutions First Amendment.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content