Remove Attorney Remove Court Decisions Remove Statute
article thumbnail

US Supreme Court hears arguments over Louisiana electoral map

JURIST

The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday over a challenge to Louisiana’s recently redrawn voting map and its two Black-majority districts. “Louisiana would rather not be here,” state attorney J. .” “Louisiana would rather not be here,” state attorney J.

Court 104
article thumbnail

Siding with the Attorney General over district attorneys, Supreme Court upholds constitutionality of statute ending most transfers to adult courts of crimes committed by juveniles under 16

At the Lectern

The Supreme Court today finds a 2018 statute did not violate the California Constitution in eliminating the possibility of transfer to adult criminal court of almost all prosecutions for crimes committed by 14- and 15-year-olds. Coverage of the decision: Bob Egelko in the San Francisco Chronicle.

Statute 40
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Restitution, medical malpractice, and a capital appeal

SCOTUSBlog

In 1993, William Neilly was sentenced in Michigan state court to life without the possibility of parole for a homicide he committed as a juvenile. Because of intervening Supreme Court decisions prohibiting the imposition of no-parole life sentences for juvenile offenders, he was resentenced to a lesser sentence.

Court 100
article thumbnail

Justices will revisit whether certain noncitizens in lengthy detention are entitled to bond hearings

SCOTUSBlog

The INA permits detention beyond the 90-day removal period for certain inadmissible noncitizens or those “determined by the Attorney General to be a risk to the community or unlikely to comply with the order of removal.” The Supreme Court previously held that the post-removal statute contains an implicit time limit.

article thumbnail

A search for coherence in the interplay between AEDPA and Brecht

SCOTUSBlog

Under AEPDA, habeas relief is only available to a prisoner whose claims were adjudicated on the merits in state court if the prisoner can show that the last reasoned state court decision was contrary to or involved an unreasonable application of Supreme Court precedent. Many of the justices seemed to agree. California.

article thumbnail

How High Court Approached Time Limit On Reg Challenges

Law 360

Supreme Court's decision in Corner Post v. Federal Reserve Board effectively gives new entities their own personal statute of limitations to challenge rules and regulations, and Justice Brett Kavanaugh's concurrence may portend the court's view that those entities do not need to be directly regulated, say attorneys at Snell & Wilmer.

Court 52
article thumbnail

What is the Impact on Broadcasters of Supreme Court Decision that Corporations Can Buy Political Ads? More Money, More Ad Challenges and the Return of the Zapple Doctrine

Broadcast Law Blog

The Supreme Court Decision in Citizens United v. Because the station cannot censor the candidate ad (except in the exceptionally rare situation where the airing of the ad might violate a Federal felony statute), the broadcaster has no liability for the contents of the ad. How much investigation is necessary?