Remove Attorney Remove Court Rules Remove Criminal Law Remove District of Columbia
article thumbnail

No, the Trump Comment on Cheney Was Not a Crime

JonathanTurley

Yesterday, Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes became the latest Democratic prosecutor to suggest a possible criminal charge against former President Donald Trump. Mayes suggested that Trump’s controversial statement on Lynne Cheney going to war could constitute a criminal threat. We have been here before with Trump.

Felony 85
article thumbnail

The lives they lived and the court they shaped: Remembering those we lost in 2020

SCOTUSBlog

In June, the court ruled in R.G. & Before becoming clerk of the Supreme Court, Stevas was the clerk of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals and worked as an assistant U.S. He also taught criminal law and trial practice at the George Washington University School of Law.

Court 123
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Profile of a potential nominee: Leondra Kruger

SCOTUSBlog

During law school, Kruger spent one summer as an intern for the U.S. attorney in Los Angeles and a second summer as a summer associate at Munger, Tolles & Olson. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from 2002 to 2003. before going to clerk for Judge David Tatel of the U.S. United States.

Court 114
article thumbnail

Schiff: House Select Committee Has Evidence That Trump “Engaged in Likely Multiple Criminal Acts”

JonathanTurley

However, the lack of factual foundation for the challenge (cited repeatedly by Judge Carter in the Trump challenge) did not make this a criminal or fraudulent effort. Some attorneys believed (and still believe) that it was possible for Pence to refuse to certify. The question is whether there is new evidence of criminal acts.

article thumbnail

MSNBC Legal Analyst Declares Trump Could Be Charged With Manslaughter

JonathanTurley

Indeed, such a use of the speech would contradict controlling Supreme Court precedent. Again, the use of such a law would fail for the reasons above. The Criminal Jury Instructions for the District of Columbia, No. That does not change due to Trump’s speech before the riot. In Brandenburg v.

Legal 56
article thumbnail

“Without any Doubt, Beyond a Reasonable Doubt, Beyond any Doubt”: Tribe Declares Trump Committed Attempted Murder

JonathanTurley

After the riot, District of Columbia Attorney General Karl Racine announced that he was considering arresting Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Indeed, such a claim would contradict controlling Supreme Court precedent. Tribe further predicted that Attorney General Merrick Garland would criminally charge Donald Trump.

article thumbnail

What Ever Happened to the Prosecution of Donald Trump for Incitement?

JonathanTurley

However, I have long maintained that there was no evidence to support a criminal charge against Trump for incitement. District of Columbia Attorney General Karl Racine announced that he was considering arresting Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Attorney General to the current U.S. Rudy Giuliani and U.S. In Brandenburg v.