Remove Attorney Remove Court Rules Remove Mississippi
article thumbnail

Abortion drug maker drops lawsuit challenging Mississippi restrictions on provision and use of drug

JURIST

An abortion-inducing drug’s manufacturer has dropped its lawsuit challenging Mississippi’s restrictions on the provision and use of the drug, in connection with “the changed national landscape” in the wake of the US Supreme Court ruling in Dobbs v. Mississippi Today said that Sen. GenBioPro Inc.,

article thumbnail

How a veteran sketch artist offers a peek into oral arguments in the work-from-home era

SCOTUSBlog

10, the court ruled unanimously in favor his clients. “I Attorney Sean Marotta, Ford Motor Co. Attorney Deepak Gupta, Ford Motor Co. Attorney Craig Goldblatt, City of Chicago v. Attorney Kelsi Corkran, Torres v. Attorney Mark Standridge, Torres v. Attorney Mark Standridge, Torres v. Barr (Nov.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

US appeals court blocks Biden federal contractor vaccine mandate

JURIST

The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Monday affirmed a preliminary injunction from the District Court for the Western District of Louisiana blocking the White House’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for federal contractors. The ruling results from a 2-1 decision from the three-judge panel.

Court 197
article thumbnail

Post-Roe States Advised to Fight Abortion like Organized Crime

The Crime Report

The Court is expected to release its opinion on Mississippi’s Dobbs v. The Mississippi case deals with a challenge to a law that banned abortion at 15 weeks of pregnancy or later, the kind of state legislation rejected by the justices in Case y. Jackson Women’s Health Organization within weeks.

Drafting 111
article thumbnail

Supreme indifference: What the Texas case signals about the court’s treatment of abortion

SCOTUSBlog

Instead, the state outsourced that job to private citizens — anyone in the state could sue an abortion provider who violated the ban, secure at least $10,000 in damages, and request a court order to stop that doctor from doing it again. 8 to go into effect does not as obviously contradict precedent — or expose the court to backlash.

article thumbnail

Justices add one religious-rights case to docket but turn down another

SCOTUSBlog

Montana Department of Revenue , the Supreme Court ruled that although states are not required to subsidize private education, states that choose to do so cannot exclude religious schools from receiving funding simply because they are religious. Mississippi v. A new case on public funding and religious education.

article thumbnail

Doubts About Lethal Injection Drugs Reignite Capital Punishment Debate

The Crime Report

Supreme Court ruled that certain cocktails of the lethal injection drugs produce results that are “cruel and unusual punishment” — particularly citing a case in Missouri where an inmate had a rare disease that following a reaction to the injection, he suffocated as his blood filled his airway, according to the DPIC.