Remove Attorney Remove Court Rules Remove Mississippi Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Post-Roe States Advised to Fight Abortion like Organized Crime

The Crime Report

The Court is expected to release its opinion on Mississippi’s Dobbs v. The Mississippi case deals with a challenge to a law that banned abortion at 15 weeks of pregnancy or later, the kind of state legislation rejected by the justices in Case y. Jackson Women’s Health Organization within weeks.

Drafting 111
article thumbnail

Ruling that nursing home arbitration agreement was invalid reversed.

Day on Torts

When the brother was admitted, plaintiff filled out admission paperwork, including an arbitration agreement, as plaintiff had a durable power of attorney for healthcare executed by the brother and naming plaintiff as the attorney-in-fact. In Welch v. National Health Corp. , 3d 876 (Tenn.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Justices add one religious-rights case to docket but turn down another

SCOTUSBlog

Montana Department of Revenue , the Supreme Court ruled that although states are not required to subsidize private education, states that choose to do so cannot exclude religious schools from receiving funding simply because they are religious. Mississippi v. A new case on public funding and religious education.

article thumbnail

The lives they lived and the court they shaped: Remembering those we lost in 2022

SCOTUSBlog

In court papers, she was identified only as “L.C.”. Four years later, her case reached the Supreme Court. In a 6-3 opinion by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the court ruled in Olmstead v. As assistant attorney general for New York from 1967 to 1978, Marcus argued — and won — six cases before the justices. 2, 2022).

Court 89
article thumbnail

February 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

If the renewal license was an order, the First Circuit asked the state court to address whether the CCA expressly preempted the ordinance challenged in this case. Four environmental organizations filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the District of Columbia challenging the U.S. City of Oakland v.