This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Federal: Federal CourtRules CTA Unconstitutional On March 1, 2024, a federal court in Alabama ruled in National Small Business United (NSBU) v. Attorney at Law The post The Alert: April – June 2024 appeared first on Parasec. To read more on Senate Bill 8059, please go here. ” ~ James N.,
But the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals the states highest court for criminal cases rejected the trial courts findings, insisting that the revised DNA analysis still pointed to Escobar’s guilt and citing other inculpatory evidence, such as Escobars bloody fingerprint and inconsistent alibi. Relisted after the Dec.
Recently, a federal court denied two back-to-back motions by a group called Green Oceans to preliminarily enjoin construction of the 704-megawatt Revolution Wind project off the coast of RhodeIsland.
Neillys petition for review will presumably be put on hold until the justices rule sometime next year on Ellingburgs case. The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to decide a related question whether a court can allow a defendant and his lawyer to meet, but nonetheless ban them from discussing his testimony.
Federal Court Stayed Remand Order in Minnesota’s Climate Case Against Fossil Fuel Industry, Denied Attorney Fees. The federal district court for the District of Minnesota stayed its order remanding Minnesota’s climate change lawsuit against the fossil fuel industry. City of Hoboken v. Exxon Mobil Corp. , 2:20-cv-14243 (D.N.J.
RhodeIsland Federal Court Denied Motion to Stay Remand Order in RhodeIsland’s Climate Change Case. RhodeIsland v. Colorado Federal Court Remanded Local Governments’ Climate Case to State Court. The court said the writer had already availed himself of the remedy offered by D.C.’s
Butte County District Attorney Mike Ramsey focused on his statement that “Chinese need to commit mass shootings against America for xenophobia and betrayal. Officials then moved under “Red Flag” laws to seize four rifles and three handguns. Come on my Chinese folks, white graduating is open season for y’all.”. In Brandenburg v.
RhodeIsland v. Montana and Wyoming Asked Supreme Court to Consider Claims That Washington Impermissibly Blocked Access for Coal Shipments. Nonprofit Group and Its Board Member Sought to Unseal Records in Attorney General’s Suit Against Exxon. The attorney general opposed intervention. Suncor Energy (U.S.A.)
The federal district court for the Eastern District of California held that more analysis of the impacts climate change would have on a water transfer program for the Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta was required under NEPA. In a letter to the court on March 2, the parties asked the court to defer further briefing on the U.S.-based
RhodeIsland , No. Connecticut Federal Court Granted State’s Motion to Remand Unfair Trade Practices Lawsuit Against Exxon. Among the arguments rejected by the court were claims that the Forest Service’s consideration of the project’s greenhouse gas effects in the final environmental impact statement (EIS) was deficient.
Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”. RhodeIsland v. Shell Oil Products Co. , 19-1818 (1st Cir.). Conservation Law Foundation v. Shell Oil Co. , 3:21-cv-00933 (D. Gulf Oil LP , No. 3:21-cv-00932 (D.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content