Attorney Criminal Law Government Statute 
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 23, 2023
Both cases arise under the federal firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § Enacted by Congress in 1994, Section 922(g)(8) criminalizes gun ownership by anyone subject to a domestic-violence restraining order. Cargill , the government the justices to weigh in. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit. In both United States v.
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 28, 2022
Even in the midst of a historic opioid crisis, and an intensely fractured Supreme Court term, the justices found common ground in longstanding presumptions of criminal law and the core principle of physician discretion. Breyer’s majority opinion reaches essentially the same result, but puts a much higher burden on the government.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
SCOTUSBlog
JULY 22, 2022
In three of the past four terms, the Supreme Court has rejected broad readings of white-collar criminal laws urged by the federal government. Those decisions concerned conduct ranging from wire and computer fraud to tax violations. A list of this week’s featured petitions is below: Momphard v. McCutchen v. United States.
SCOTUSBlog
FEBRUARY 24, 2022
United States , which examines whether the federal government can bring criminal charges in federal court against a defendant previously found guilty in a Court of Indian Offenses for an offense stemming from the same act. Kimberly responded that there are two easy fixes, both of which, he asserted, respect tribal sovereignty.
JonathanTurley
JUNE 9, 2023
to be charged criminally for transporting 36 people to Sacramento. California Attorney General Rob Bonta (D) chimed in, declaring the flight from Florida might be “ State-sanctioned kidnapping.” Attorney for the District of Massachusetts, announced that she was taking a look, “long and hard,” at potential charges.
Paralegal-Edu.Org
FEBRUARY 21, 2025
Have you ever wondered what happens behind the scenes in a law office, particularly when a high-profile trial sparks public interest? Maybe youve pictured a bustling room filled with endless paperwork, or youve imagined a stern-faced attorney pacing around, phone in hand. However, its still a serious responsibility. Sound glamorous?
JonathanTurley
MAY 19, 2021
One of the greatest threats to free speech is the chilling effect caused by ambiguous or vague standards like the one contained in this statute. 92, 95 (1972), that the “government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content.”. Free speech demands bright lines.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
95 
Let's personalize your content