This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit concluded Thursday that Kentucky may enforce price gouging laws against sellers on Amazon, overturning a district court preliminary injunction. ” Additionally, a second relevant statute in this case prohibits misleading trade conduct. .
Walker’s attorney, Tom Wine, argued that he was acting in self defense in accordance with Kentucky’s self-defense statute when he fired a single “warning shot,” striking Mattingly. This motion now permanently closes the case against Walker in the Kentucky judicial system.
Share This week we highlight cert petitions that ask the Supreme Court to consider, among other things, whether Kentucky can recover $870 million from an online poker platform to recoup Kentuckians’ losses and whether federal approval of Roundup can protect Monsanto from violations under California law. Kentucky, ex rel.
But earlier this year, Texas attorney general Ken Paxton opened up a new battleground: the home. Fearing that children might soon be taken away from their parents, or worse, the attorneys immediately filed for an injunction—both on the interpretation and on the investigations themselves. Only a Pause. Omar Ochoa.
. “The policy of this (long-standing) consumer protection law is that no family should lose its shelter, which is necessary for their survival and ability to work,” said Phoenix bankruptcy attorney Diane Drain. ” Tucson attorney David Hameroff agrees. Arizona bankruptcy attorneys are among those who oppose.
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit eventually affirmed the district court’s denial of the legislators’ attempt on the ground that the state attorney general was adequately defending the law. Kentucky when the evidence was not available to the petitioner during state court Batson proceedings. The en banc U.S. The case is George v.
In 2016, California’s attorney general sued Ethicon, a pelvic-mesh manufacturer owned by Johnson & Johnson, accusing the company of marketing the devices to women and doctors in the state without sufficient warning of possible side effects. United States v.
The remaining 97 percent have been decided by plea bargain: an arrangement made between a prosecutor, defense attorney, judge, and the defendant under which an individual enters a guilty or no contest plea in exchange for a reduction in the level of a charge, a reduced number of charges, or the recommendation of a lighter sentence.
The Refractive Surgery Council (RSC) and Society for Excellence in Eyecare (SEE) , the Medical Device Manufacturers Association (MDMA) , and even the Commonwealth of Kentucky’sattorney general (AG) all requested the draft guidance be withdrawn. This proposal is a[n]. intrusion [into] the doctor-patient relationship.
She later deleted her account (likely after her attorney regained consciousness). See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. Griffen then appealed and the attorney for the Haunted Hotel quoted Hunter S. The other employees were reportedly shaken up and Logan County Prosecuting Attorney John Bennett later suspended White.
See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. Griffen then appealed and the attorney for the Haunted Hotel quoted Hunter S. The other employees were reportedly shaken up and Logan County Prosecuting Attorney John Bennett later suspended White. Kentucky v. Thompson: “Buy the ticket, take the ride.” Watkins (2008).
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit erred in denying the Kentuckyattorney general’s motion to intervene on the commonwealth’s behalf in litigation concerning Kentucky House Bill 454, the state’s controversial abortion law. EMW agreed to dismiss claims against the attorney general without prejudice. Facts of the Case.
While this matter was pending before the Sixth Circuit, the Secretary retained lawyers from the KentuckyAttorney General’s office to represent him. After the Sixth Circuit upheld the permanent injunction against Kentucky’s law by a divided vote, the Secretary decided not to appeal further.
Coverage of federal fraud statutes Porat v. Kentucky because “it implies some sort of nefarious intent on the part of prosecutors.” Kentucky ex rel. There are six newly relisted cases this week, so I’m going to be more summary than usual in describing them. This week’s relists are a real grab bag of issues.
Travis County District Attorney José Garza supported that request, arguing that the DNA evidence was “inaccurate and misleading” and urging the justices to “summarily reverse.” Escobar is supported by “friend of the court” briefs filed by the American Bar Association and former state attorneys general and other prosecutors.
The other potential blockbuster of the week, which involves a legal challenge to a Kentucky abortion law, appears likely to be resolved on procedural grounds in favor of the state’s Attorney General. Below is a brief summary of the issues before the Court: Cameron v. EMW Women’s Surgical Center, P.S.C.:
Kentucky ex rel. (rescheduled before the Mar. 26 and May 9 conferences; relisted after the May 16, May 23, May 30, June 6 and June 13 conferences) Jane Doe 1 v. rescheduled before the Jan.
Without representation from an attorney, Granier filed his own petition for review from the state prison in Angola, Louisiana, arguing, in Granier v. Kentucky ex rel. Hooper , that the Supreme Court had recognized claims of implied bias and that there was a division among the federal courts of appeals on the question.
Matthew Woods (a former intern) expressed interest in an open position for a staff attorney with the clinic and disclosed to the director of the clinic that he was currently in a same-sex relationship; he also indicated he was not attending church and provided no reference from a pastor. Commissioner of Internal Revenue , 21-379. 10 and Jan.
As these allegations of antitrust violations have risen to the fore, Republican Attorneys General have also taken aim at asset managers’ responses to ESG-related shareholder proposals. There are several statutes that form the basis of our antitrust laws. And what are the permissible boundaries of that behavior?
The justices did not act on two sets of high-profile petitions that they considered last week: a group of challenges to bans imposed by Illinois and several municipalities in that state on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, as well as challenges to bans on gender-affirming care for minors in Tennessee and Kentucky.
See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. Griffen then appealed and the attorney for the Haunted Hotel quoted Hunter S. The other employees were reportedly shaken up and Logan County Prosecuting Attorney John Bennett later suspended White. Kentucky v. Thompson: “Buy the ticket, take the ride.”
Last spring, Tennessee and Kentucky enacted laws that prevent children under the age of 18 from receiving gender-affirming care. On the same day last June, federal district courts in Tennessee and Kentucky issued orders blocking the laws from going into effect. Kentucky ex rel. Kentucky ex rel. In United States v.
In Cameron , the justices are considering whether the Kentuckyattorney general can intervene to defend a state law restricting abortion after another state official declined to do so. KentuckyAttorney General Daniel Cameron. Matthew Kuhn, the principal deputy solicitor general of Kentucky, represented Cameron.
Kentucky ex rel. Last year, Tennessee and Kentucky were among a group of more than 20 states that enacted laws that prohibit giving transgender youths under the age of 18 medical treatment to align their appearance with their gender identity. Kentucky and Tennessee then asked the U.S. Skrmetti , L. Skrmetti , and Jane Doe 1 v.
So-called “trigger” laws have already gone into effect in states where anti-abortion statutes are already on the books have been activated by the decision. Alabama’s Attorney General was granted an emergency motion to dissolve an injunction against the law on Friday afternoon. Law: Kentucky HB148 2019. South Dakota.
825 (1988), a Georgia statute “expressly referred” to an ERISA benefit plan. In finding that the state statute was preempted by ERISA, the Court stated that “[t]he state statute’s express reference to ERISA plans suffices to bring it within the federal law’s [preemptive] reach.” In Mackey v. Lanier , 486 U.S.
Supreme Court held that the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it concluded that its review of the remand order in Baltimore’s climate change case against fossil fuel companies was limited to determining whether the defendants properly removed the case under the federal officer removal statute. May 10, 2021).
On October 19th, 2022, a coalition of 19 Republican attorneys general (“AGs”) announced an investigation into six NZBA signatories: Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and Wells Fargo (the “NZBA Investigation”). State attorneys general are under no such constraint. Antitrust Framework.
Plaintiffs, including 22 state attorneys general and medical associations, argued that the cap violated federal law and threatened to disrupt biomedical research and public health initiatives. In 1995, Garr Keith Hardin and Jeffrey Clark were convicted of murdering Rhonda Sue Warford in Kentucky.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content