Remove Attorney Remove South Dakota Remove Statute
article thumbnail

What Do Startups Need to Know About Data Privacy Law?

Strictly Business

Additionally, there are a number of federal statutes that apply to specific business activities that implicate data privacy issues. Although these state laws are based on the FTC Act, they are often enforced more aggressively by state attorneys general and private litigants and apply to conduct that would not be illegal under the FTC Act.

Laws 52
article thumbnail

Arizona court rules abortion ban after 15 weeks of pregnancy unconstitutional

JURIST

Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes stated she would “not enforce it even if the court upheld the ban.” On the contrary, Florida, Nebraska and South Dakota rejected the amendments. This causes plaintiffs to suffer significant constitutional and psychological harm.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Texting in the car, surveillance of a home, and Section 1983 for Miranda

SCOTUSBlog

Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit and the Colorado and South Dakota Supreme Courts have considered such long-term surveillance a “search” because it infringes expectation of privacy that society is prepared to recognize as reasonable. In his petition, Tuggle argues that the U.S. Lamoureux v. Bethany Hospice and Palliative Care LLC.

Court 106
article thumbnail

Abortion Battle Enters Second Phase

The Crime Report

So-called “trigger” laws have already gone into effect in states where anti-abortion statutes are already on the books have been activated by the decision. Alabama’s Attorney General was granted an emergency motion to dissolve an injunction against the law on Friday afternoon. South Dakota. Law: South Dakota HB1249 2005.

Felony 59
article thumbnail

October 2019 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

South Dakota Federal Court Granted Preliminary Injunction Against Enforcement of Laws Targeting Pipeline Protesters. The court also temporarily enjoined two felony riot statutes because they went “far beyond” the State’s “appropriate interest” in criminalizing participation in a riot with acts of force or violence. Jewell , No.

Court 40