article thumbnail

Two death penalty cases and free speech at animal facilities

SCOTUSBlog

Andrus further argues that the Texas court’s decision conflicts with “vertical stare decisis,” the principle that lower courts must follow the Supreme Court’s decisions. Intellectual disability and the death penalty. CLS Transportation Los Angeles LLC. Apple Inc. Qualcomm Incorporated.

article thumbnail

Religion and the Death Penalty’s Most Devout Supporters: “Father Forgive them, for They Know Not What They Are Doing”

The Crime Report

On February 1, 2023, the Death Penalty Information Center reported that Andrus’ attorney, Gretchen Sween , told the Los Angeles Times that the latest Supreme Court denial left her client a “broken” man “careening toward the abyss.” Andrus’ attorney, Gretchen Sween, once again sought and secured certiorari review before the Supreme Court.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Assignor Estoppel Persists — But Only for Claims Specifically Assigned

Patently O

These ideas of stare decisis and silent reenactment are part of a major ongoing debate within the Court over its role in changing its own prior precedent. = = = =.

article thumbnail

‘Outrageous Outcomes’: Plea Bargaining and the Justice System

The Crime Report

The remaining 97 percent have been decided by plea bargain: an arrangement made between a prosecutor, defense attorney, judge, and the defendant under which an individual enters a guilty or no contest plea in exchange for a reduction in the level of a charge, a reduced number of charges, or the recommendation of a lighter sentence.

article thumbnail

Collateral Estoppel Beats Precedent Every Time

Patently O

Apple’s attorneys were able to convince the judge that the license to Fortress meant that Uniloc no longer held full rights to the patent and thus lacked standing to sue. Uniloc then failed to meet the goal, and, by the terms of the deal, those license rights arguably automatically passed to Fortress. After some venue-action, Uniloc v.

article thumbnail

A few initial thoughts on Loper and the end of Chevron Deference

Patently O

In the past, both the USPTO and patent attorneys have largely ignored the larger scope of administrative law, but in recent years USPTO operations have been under tighter control from the White House, and courts have increasingly asked whether the agency is following the rules. to dictate the outcome of cases.”

article thumbnail

Atextual Conditions for Patentability and Stare Decisis

Patently O

Steve Gass has a PhD in physics and also a patent attorney. And, in any case, these exceptions have defined the reach of the statute as a matter of statutory stare decisis going back 150 years. My middle school shop teacher was missing fingers courtesy of a table saw. Kappos , 561 U.S. 593 (2010).