This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
It is not possible to talk about eDiscovery or document review heading in to 2021 without mention of technology-assistedreview. In its broadest use as a technical term, TAR can refer to virtually any manner of technical assistance. In this narrower sense, TAR often comes with a version number – TAR 1.0,
The largest group of respondents to the Litigation Technology & E-Discovery Survey (32%) practice at firms with 2-9 attorneys while 10% of respondents are solo attorneys and 25% are at firms with 10-49 attorneys. The results of the survey thus skew slightly more towards mid-size and smaller law firms.
is the understanding of preserving, processing, reviewing, and producing electronically stored information (ESI). If your profession includes anything related to litigation (paralegal, attorney, support staff, technology person, project manager, etc.), Advances in Technology. Ediscovery.
A document repository that contains not only the content of a document but the metadata, along with memorializing attorney analysis on each document, is an important element to the litigator’s toolbox. Creating a robust document repository also allows for the reuse of client documents and attorney work product.
Document review has changed. Attorneys must confront dense forests of data to uncover what matters quickly, and doing so without a little help from AI has become exceedingly difficult.
Courts often subject parties using technologyassistedreview to greater scrutiny than parties conducting linear, manual document review, so parties using large language models for document review should expect even more attention, along with a corresponding need for quality control and validation, say attorneys at Sidley.
[{"content":{"text":" [A review of a recent Law.com article " Replacing AttorneyReview? Sidley's Experimental Assessment of GPT-4u2019s Performance in Document Review ," by Colleen M. A second pass refining those instructions with feedback on the initial pass, akin to the QC step in a traditional review.
Legal document review is often viewed as the most expensive part of eDiscovery, and many attorneys believe that there’s no way around it. If you hold that belief too, then I have good news for you: Document review doesn’t have to come with such a high price tag. Spending Too Much Time on Search Term Negotiations.
[{"content":{"text":" When ChatGPT was released two years ago, attorneys and legal technology experts had one big question: Whatu2019s going to change? While the ethical and regulatory implications of the technology remain to be seen, its potential to transform the way attorneys get work done is undeniable.
PARALEGAL ADVICE IF YOUR ATTORNEY WANTS IT IN PAPER That may still happen today. Some firms, certainly smaller firms, don’t have the internal resources or the training resources or even the technology in-house, and so they’re relying on an outside vendor to do the e-discovery work. We want you to succeed. It helps us.
Similarly, Epiqs launch of Epiq AI Labs and its AI Discovery Assistant earlier this year evinces a clear move toward foundational AI infrastructure, not just a simple point solution. The tool is designed to automate over 80% of review processes and complete them up to 90% faster than TAR.
Especially when it comes to technology, many lawyers are reluctant to put their confidence in workflows and solutions that seem to operate in a black box. Technology-assistedreview is a prime example—although the use of predictive coding and other advanced analytics have been widely accepted in the U.S.
From corporate counsel to law firms to contract attorneys, this term of art can carry several meanings. In a nutshell, modern law refers to the idea of taking a business-centered approach to legal practice by embracing emerging technologies and new partnerships to increase efficiency and make smarter operational decisions.
New York Trial Court Set Parameters for Exxon’s Compliance with Attorney General’s Climate Change Investigation. The court indicated that the attorney general had broad power to propound the interrogatories. Exxon Said Federal Court Should Not Dismiss Its Constitutional Claims Against Attorneys General. 47641-0-II (Wash.
The Washington Court of Appeals affirmed a guilty verdict against a climate activist who cut a chain to enter a pipeline facility and attempted to cut a bolt that secured a shutoff valve on the pipeline, which carried tar sands oil from Canada. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (In re 401 Certification for Line 3 Replacement Project) , No.
12] Similar pushback was seen in 2021 letter written by a group of attorney generals to BlackRock’s CEO, Larry Fink. [13] 14] Though Fink has maintained the attorney generals’ concerns were unfounded—based on misinformation and political theatrics—the views expressed in the letter, nonetheless, continue to pervade the ring-wing party. [15]
Vermont Court Said Former Attorney General Could Be Deposed on Use of Private Email Account. Attorney General of Vermont , No. Jacobson demanded damages from Clack and NAS “to be determined at trial believed to be in excess of Ten Million Dollars,” plus punitive damages and attorney fees. 349-6-16WNCV (Vt. Jacobson v.
The Climate Disobedience Action Fund reported that the North Dakota court sentenced an activist who disabled the TransCanada Keystone 1 tar sands pipeline in North Dakota to three years in prison, with two years deferred. The action involved closing valves on pipelines in Washington, Montana, Minnesota, and North Dakota.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content