This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The Supreme Court has announced a seven-case late-May calendar. Like all calendars since April 2020 , and for the foreseeable future, May’s arguments will be remote and based in San Francisco. (See May is the only month with two oral argument sessions. See here , here , here , and here.) The court granted review in March 2020.
The Supreme Court has announced its January calendar, the first one to be presided over by Patricia Guerrero, who will be sworn in as Chief Justice days before the arguments. Related: “What’s ailing the California Supreme Court? merge with the charged homicide and cannot be the basis for a second degree felony-murder instruction.”
The case involves Senate Bill 1437 , which narrowed murder liability under the felony murder theory and the natural and probable consequences doctrine. Lewis was argued on the late-May calendar and Pollock was argued in early May. The court granted review in March 2020. Tri-Modal Distribution Services.
The Supreme Court hasn’t been holding many oral arguments this term: only 23 cases have been heard or scheduled through the court’s recently announced March calendar , which will be its seventh of 2024–2025. State of California the court granted review inNovember 2021. Theres been no ruling on the motion.
The Supreme Court today announced it would hear arguments in seven cases at its next calendar, the second of two calendars in May. This will be a heavier calendar than the court has had in a while. Like all calendars since April 2020 , the late-May 2022 calendar will be remote and based in San Francisco.
Supreme Court is returning to courtroom for oral arguments next month, but not California’s high court. Like all calendars since April 2020 , and for the foreseeable future, the October calendar — announced today — will be remote and based in San Francisco. (See here , here , here , here , and here.)
The Supreme Court today announced it will hear nine cases on its early-May calendar. May is the only month with two argument calendars.) After the early-May arguments, the court will have issued opinions, or have opinions in the pipeline, in 42 cases with two later calendars still to be announced. Brown (2017) 3 Cal.5th
The Supreme Court today announced it will hear eight cases on it June calendar. Some Courts of Appeal are returning to in-person arguments, but the Supreme Court’s June calendar, like all of its calendars since April 2020 , will be remote and based in San Francisco. California (1967) 386 U.S.
After its normal two-month oral argument hiatus, the Supreme Court will conduct a six-case calendar next month, the court announced today. All but one of the matters are criminal. The court will still be hearing arguments remotely, as it has since April 2020. (See See here , here , here , here , and here.) Code, §§ 667, subd. (c)(6)
The Supreme Court has announced a four-case February calendar. Related: “What’s ailing the California Supreme Court? The arguments will be live streamed , as all arguments have been since May 2016. The court continues on a pace for a low output of opinions. Its productivity has plummeted”.) In re F.M. : 1997) 14 Cal.4th
The Supreme Court hasn’t published its December calendar yet (there are some technical problems with the court’s website), but, from email notifications, we know four of the cases that will be argued next month. d)) was a serious felony (id., §§ 667, subd. (a)(1), California (2007) 549 U.S. a)(1), 1192.7,
Now that oral arguments are finished for the term (there won’t be another calendar until September), we’re updating the list. The latest docket entries, in October 2023, show a defense motion — and the People’s response to the motion — to stay the appeal and for a limited remand or, in the alternative, for calendar preference.
The Supreme Court will begin its December calendar with a memorial for former Justice John Arguelles, who died in April. The court has now posted the calendar. The calendar includes just the four cases we mentioned yesterday. (d)) d)) was a serious felony (id., §§ 667, subd. (a)(1), California (2007) 549 U.S.
These will be the last opinions in the four cases argued on the December calendar. d)) was a serious felony (id., §§ 667, subd. (a)(1), California (2007) 549 U.S. Tomorrow morning, the Supreme Court will file its opinions in People v. Brown and In re Cabrera. Briefs here ; oral argument video here and here.) a)(1), 1192.7,
subdivision (e), is the trial court permitted to impose not only the target offense or underlying felony, but also corresponding enhancements? These will be the third and fourth of nine opinions for cases argued on the early-May calendar. The court granted review in March 2023. More about the case here.
292, Division One said, “we note ‘California courts have uniformly come to the conclusion that Perkins [not Miranda ] controls when a suspect invokes his Miranda right to counsel but later speaks with someone he does not know is an agent of the police.’ Regents of the University of California (2024) 16 Cal.5th
On September 30, the Fourth Circuit tentatively calendared oral argument on the companies’ appeal for the December 10–12 argument session. The court also temporarily enjoined two felony riot statutes because they went “far beyond” the State’s “appropriate interest” in criminalizing participation in a riot with acts of force or violence.
The federal district court for the Northern District of California denied Oakland’s and San Francisco’s motions to remand their climate change public nuisance lawsuits against five major fossil fuel producers to state court. People of State of California v. California Federal Court Upheld Environmental Law Waivers for Border Wall.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content