Calendaring Court Rules Rhode Island 
JonathanTurley
JANUARY 17, 2024
In 1984, the Supreme Court ruled in Chevron U.S.A. We should acknowledge forthrightly that Chevron did not undo, and could not have undone, the judicial duty to provide an independent judgment of the law’s meaning in the cases that come before the Nation’s courts.” The cases are Loper Bright Enterprises v.
TypeLaw Briefing Insights
JANUARY 21, 2025
Weve prepared this guide to 2025 court holidays as a go-to resource to help you proactively mark critical dates in your calendar to ensure that youre always one step ahead of the clock. Calendar of 2025 state and local court holidays January Robert E. 6(a)(6) ), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (See Fed.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Parasec
APRIL 4, 2024
Federal: Federal Court Rules CTA Unconstitutional On March 1, 2024, a federal court in Alabama ruled in National Small Business United (NSBU) v. Failure to file before the deadline will result in a risk of prosecution if the ruling in NSBU v. Yellen is reversed or modified.
SCOTUSBlog
MAY 29, 2025
Supporting briefs from groups including the Professional Services Council warn the lower courts ruling may chill contractor participation in federal programs. Tune in Monday to find out whether the court will be adding anything to the fall argument calendar. Thats all for this week. New Relists Bost v.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
OCTOBER 7, 2019
The district court said Baltimore could seek to rescind the temporary extension “as improvidently granted” by filing a motion by October 7. On September 30, the Fourth Circuit tentatively calendared oral argument on the companies’ appeal for the December 10–12 argument session. Rhode Island v. BP p.l.c. , Chevron Corp. ,
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
MARCH 6, 2018
The federal district court for the Eastern District of California held that more analysis of the impacts climate change would have on a water transfer program for the Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta was required under NEPA. In a letter to the court on March 2, the parties asked the court to defer further briefing on the U.S.-based
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
61 
Let's personalize your content