This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The Supreme Court today announced it will hear just four arguments in October. Most calendars are conducted in San Francisco, Los Angeles, or Sacramento. The court granted review in July 2023. 2) Did the Court of Appeal correctly determine that the co-tenancy provision in this case is enforceable?
Tomorrow morning, the Supreme Court will file its opinion in People v. It will be the first decision in an October calendar case. All of the cases had a Court of Appeal justice sitting pro tem. In Gentile , the court limited the issues to these: “1. Briefs here ; oral argument video here.)
The Supreme Court has announced a seven-case late-May calendar. Like all calendars since April 2020 , and for the foreseeable future, May’s arguments will be remote and based in San Francisco. (See The court granted review in February 2020. The court granted review in January 2020. Soher (1884) 2 Cal.Unrep.
The Supreme Court has announced its January calendar, the first one to be presided over by Patricia Guerrero, who will be sworn in as Chief Justice days before the arguments. At its current pace, the court will issue only 48 or 49 opinions this term, on a par with last term’s historically low output. Code, § 190.2,
Tomorrow morning, the Supreme Court will file its opinion in People v. This will be the last opinion for cases argued on the April calendar. Reyes is another case concerning possible resentencing under Senate Bill 1437 , which limited criminal liability for felony murder or murder under the natural-and-probable-consequences doctrine.
On Monday morning, the Supreme Court will file its opinion in People v. This will be the last opinion in the three cases argued on the September calendar. It is one of many cases that are or have been on the Supreme Court’s docket concerning Senate Bill No. Briefs here ; oral argument video here.)
Tomorrow morning, the Supreme Court will file its opinion in People v. By contrast, there has been no decision yet in any case argued on the April calendar. By contrast, there has been no decision yet in any case argued on the April calendar. The court granted review in August 2020. It is also filing faster than usual.
Monday morning, the Supreme Court will file its opinions in People v. The court limited the issues in Lewis to: “(1) May superior courts consider the record of conviction in determining whether a defendant has made a prima facie showing of eligibility for relief under Penal Code section 1170.95? Lewis and Pollock v.
The Supreme Court hasn’t been holding many oral arguments this term: only 23 cases have been heard or scheduled through the court’s recently announced March calendar , which will be its seventh of 2024–2025. The court sent its oral argument letter in September. The last update was in June 2024.
The Supreme Court today announced it would hear arguments in seven cases at its next calendar, the second of two calendars in May. This will be a heavier calendar than the court has had in a while. There haven’t been more than five arguments in a month since the court heard seven cases last June.
On Monday morning, the Supreme Court will file its opinion in People v. This will be the second of seven opinions for cases argued on the late-May calendar. This will be the second of seven opinions for cases argued on the late-May calendar. The court granted review in March 2021. Code, § 190.2,
Supreme Court is returning to courtroom for oral arguments next month, but not California’s high court. Like all calendars since April 2020 , and for the foreseeable future, the October calendar — announced today — will be remote and based in San Francisco. (See here , here , here , here , and here.)
The Supreme Court today announced it will hear nine cases on its early-May calendar. May is the only month with two argument calendars.) After the early-May arguments, the court will have issued opinions, or have opinions in the pipeline, in 42 cases with two later calendars still to be announced.
The Supreme Court today announced it will hear eight cases on it June calendar. Because the court does not conduct oral arguments during the summer, these will be the last arguments until September. The court granted review less than five months ago and expedited briefing and oral argument. Code, § 186.22, subd. (b)(1);
After its normal two-month oral argument hiatus, the Supreme Court will conduct a six-case calendar next month, the court announced today. The court will still be hearing arguments remotely, as it has since April 2020. (See ” The court granted review in June 2020. The court granted review in December 2020.
The Supreme Court has announced a four-case February calendar. The court continues on a pace for a low output of opinions. Related: “What’s ailing the California Supreme Court? Related: “What’s ailing the California Supreme Court? Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal.2d Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal.2d
The Supreme Court hasn’t published its December calendar yet (there are some technical problems with the court’s website), but, from email notifications, we know four of the cases that will be argued next month. When the court granted review in Brown , it limited the issues to: “1. Steger (1976) 16 Cal.3d
Six months ago, we identified the ten oldest cases on the Supreme Court’s docket, other than death penalty appeals. Now that oral arguments are finished for the term (there won’t be another calendar until September), we’re updating the list. The court hasn’t even sent an oral argument letter yet.
The Supreme Court will begin its December calendar with a memorial for former Justice John Arguelles, who died in April. Arguelles, who served on the court for two years starting in 1987, was 94. The court has now posted the calendar. There had been some tech problems with the court’s website.)
Tomorrow morning, the Supreme Court will file its opinion in In re F.M. Opinions in the five March calendar cases should file by June 5. Opinions in the five March calendar cases should file by June 5. In October 2021 , the court granted the petition for review that was filed 10 days late. 1997) 14 Cal.4th
We just yesterday noted that the Supreme Court hadn’t filed an opinion since the end of August, and also why that gap wasn’t unusual. Well, the drought ends tomorrow when the court will decide three cases — Yahoo! These opinions will decide half of the court’s September calendar. Miranda-Guerrero.
Tomorrow morning, the Supreme Court will file its opinions in People v. These will be the last opinions in the four cases argued on the December calendar. In Brown , the court limited the issues to: “1. Did the trial court err in instructing the jury on the elements of first degree murder by poison (see People v.
Tomorrow morning, the Supreme Court will file its opinions in People v. The court’s website does not list issues for death penalty appeals. In Arellano , the court is expected to decide: When a defendant obtains resentencing of a conviction under Penal Code section 1172.6, The court granted review in March 2023.
Tomorrow morning, the Supreme Court will file its opinions in People v. The opinions will leave two undecided cases from the eight-case June calendar. There is also one undecided case — a death penalty appeal with post-argument briefing — from the late-May calendar. Renteria , People v. Aguayo , and People v.
There were no straight grants at yesterday’s Supreme Court conference , but several justices weren’t happy about that. Four different members of the court dissented from various denials of petitions for review. The court just barely denied review in People v. Supreme Court opinion in Illinois v. In People v.
Tomorrow morning, the Supreme Court will file its opinion in People v. Superior Court (Mitchell). 2) If the temporary stay issued by the Court of Appeal had not expired at the time of defendant’s guilty plea, what was the effect, if any, of the stay on the resolution of defendant’s criminal proceedings?”
Fourth Circuit Declined to Stay Remand Order in Baltimore’s Climate Case Against Fossil Fuel Companies; Companies Sought Stay from Supreme Court. Supreme Court. On October 2, the district court granted the companies’ motion to temporarily extend its stay of the remand order until the Supreme Court resolves the application.
Federal Court Denied Oakland and San Francisco Motions to Return Climate Change Nuisance Cases to State Court; Found Federal Common Law of Nuisance Could Apply, Despite AEP v. The court dispensed with the cities’ three primary arguments for remanding the cases. HERE ARE THE ADDITIONS TO THE CLIMATE CASE CHART SINCE UPDATE # 107.
Here is the column: Hunter Biden returned to court today on the felony indictment for his possession of a handgun, including allegations that he lied on an Oct.12, The problem for the case is that Hunter and his counsel appear to have an elastic calendar on his addiction, depending on its value in a given case or controversy.
Share The court will hear oral argument next term in a challenge to the congressional redistricting plan that South Carolina’s Republican-controlled legislature enacted in the wake of the 2020 census. The legislators appealed to the Supreme Court. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content