This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Share For the second week in a row, the Supreme Court did not add any new cases to its docket for the 2024-25 term. One regulation requires anyone who gives more than $2,000 in a calendar year to groups that spend money to influence the elections of candidates to report the donation within 24 hours.
Share A pair of challenges to controversial social media laws in Texas and Florida and a dispute over whether to freeze the Environmental Protection Agency’s plan to reduce ozone levels across the United States headline the Supreme Court’s February 2024 argument calendar , which was released on Friday morning. Nealy (Feb. McIntosh v.
Share The Supreme Court will hear oral argument in February on whether to freeze a plan created by the Environmental Protection Agency to reduce ozone levels across the United States while litigation over the plan continues in a federal appeals court. Three states – Ohio, Indiana, and WestVirginia – went to D.C.
June 3 is the filing deadline for license renewals for radio stations in Maryland, DC, Virginia and WestVirginia. The court will likely take several months after the argument to finally resolve these issues. To look ahead at some of the other upcoming deadlines, see our Broadcaster’s Calendar, here.
Even though there are no renewal filing deadlines this month, radio stations in Maryland, Virginia, WestVirginia and DC must continue their on-air post-filing announcements on the 1 st and 16 th of the month. Phase 5 stations do not need to file this quarter because they recently submitted their 10-week Schedule 387 filings.
And, of course, there is the political calendar. Opponents of LDT regulation received a boost with last year’s Supreme Court decision overturning an agency action based on the “major questions” doctrine, WestVirginia v. All of this will take time.
Fourth Circuit Declined to Stay Remand Order in Baltimore’s Climate Case Against Fossil Fuel Companies; Companies Sought Stay from Supreme Court. Supreme Court. On October 2, the district court granted the companies’ motion to temporarily extend its stay of the remand order until the Supreme Court resolves the application.
Share In an argument calendar released on Friday afternoon, the Supreme Court announced that it will hear oral arguments in seven cases over five days. 28 in WestVirginia v. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. WestVirginia v. The justices will hear oral argument on Feb.
Federal Court Denied Oakland and San Francisco Motions to Return Climate Change Nuisance Cases to State Court; Found Federal Common Law of Nuisance Could Apply, Despite AEP v. The court dispensed with the cities’ three primary arguments for remanding the cases. HERE ARE THE ADDITIONS TO THE CLIMATE CASE CHART SINCE UPDATE # 107.
Below is my column in The Messenger on the challenge facing the Supreme Court in the coming week over the electoral disqualification of former president Donald Trump in Colorado and Maine. The appeal in Maine has been filed and can now work its way up to the Court. Colorado is expected to file with the Court this week.
Every Supreme Court confirmation has its own complications. That swift schedule is quicker than most Supreme Court nominations in recent decades, though not as hurried as the Barrett timeline. Unlike during previous Supreme Court confirmations, the Judiciary Committee is evenly split with 11 members from each party.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content