This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The Supreme Court today announced it would hear arguments in seven cases at its next calendar, the second of two calendars in May. This will be a heavier calendar than the court has had in a while. Strong : Does a felony-murder special circumstance finding (Pen. 12101 et seq.)? The court granted review in February 2021.
Most calendars are conducted in San Francisco, Los Angeles, or Sacramento. The case was originally on the June calendar, but there was a last-minute continuance. The Supreme Court today announced it will hear just four arguments in October. The hearings will be at a special session in Fresno. The court granted review in October 2022.
Like all calendars since April 2020 , and for the foreseeable future, the October calendar — announced today — will be remote and based in San Francisco. (See here , here , here , here , and here.) Supreme Court is returning to courtroom for oral arguments next month, but not California’s high court.
It will be the first decision in an October calendar case. Tomorrow morning, the Supreme Court will file its opinion in People v. Briefs here ; oral argument video here.) Opinions in the other three October cases are expected by January 4. All of the cases had a Court of Appeal justice sitting pro tem.
The Supreme Court today announced it will hear eight cases on it June calendar. Some Courts of Appeal are returning to in-person arguments, but the Supreme Court’s June calendar, like all of its calendars since April 2020 , will be remote and based in San Francisco.
The Supreme Court today announced it will hear nine cases on its early-May calendar. May is the only month with two argument calendars.) After the early-May arguments, the court will have issued opinions, or have opinions in the pipeline, in 42 cases with two later calendars still to be announced. Brown (2017) 3 Cal.5th
The Supreme Court has announced a seven-case late-May calendar. Like all calendars since April 2020 , and for the foreseeable future, May’s arguments will be remote and based in San Francisco. (See May is the only month with two oral argument sessions. See here , here , here , and here.) The court granted review in March 2020.
This will be the second of seven opinions for cases argued on the late-May calendar. Strong is expected to decide whether a felony-murder special circumstance finding (Pen. Four of the other opinions will likely file by August 22 and one, in a death penalty appeal with post-argument briefing, should file by September 12. Code, § 190.2,
The Supreme Court hasn’t been holding many oral arguments this term: only 23 cases have been heard or scheduled through the court’s recently announced March calendar , which will be its seventh of 2024–2025. Horvitz & Levy is co-counsel for amicus UC Irvine law schools Consumer Law Clinic.) More about the case here.
After its normal two-month oral argument hiatus, the Supreme Court will conduct a six-case calendar next month, the court announced today. All but one of the matters are criminal. The court will still be hearing arguments remotely, as it has since April 2020. (See See here , here , here , here , and here.) Code, §§ 667, subd. (c)(6)
The Supreme Court has announced a four-case February calendar. Did the Court of Appeal err in ruling that the trial court adequately exercised its discretion to determine whether the juvenile’s offenses were felonies or misdemeanors as required by Welfare and Institutions Code section 702 and In re Manzy W. In re F.M. :
The Supreme Court has announced its January calendar, the first one to be presided over by Patricia Guerrero, who will be sworn in as Chief Justice days before the arguments. merge with the charged homicide and cannot be the basis for a second degree felony-murder instruction.” There will be five cases heard. Chun (2009) 45 Cal.4th
subdivision (e), is the trial court permitted to impose not only the target offense or underlying felony, but also corresponding enhancements? These will be the third and fourth of nine opinions for cases argued on the early-May calendar. The court granted review in March 2023. More about the case here.
The Supreme Court hasn’t published its December calendar yet (there are some technical problems with the court’s website), but, from email notifications, we know four of the cases that will be argued next month. d)) was a serious felony (id., §§ 667, subd. (a)(1), Code, § 243, subd. (d)) a)(1), 1192.7,
The Supreme Court will begin its December calendar with a memorial for former Justice John Arguelles, who died in April. The court has now posted the calendar. The calendar includes just the four cases we mentioned yesterday. d)) was a serious felony (id., §§ 667, subd. (a)(1), Code, § 243, subd. (d)) a)(1), 1192.7,
Opinions in the five March calendar cases should file by June 5. is expected to decide whether the Court of Appeal erred in ruling that the trial court adequately exercised its discretion to determine whether the juvenile’s offenses were felonies or misdemeanors as required by Welfare and Institutions Code section 702 and In re Manzy W
This will be the last opinion in the three cases argued on the September calendar. 1437 , 2018 legislation that allows resentencing of some defendants convicted of felony murder or murder under a natural-and-probable-consequences theory. On Monday morning, the Supreme Court will file its opinion in People v.
This will be the last opinion for cases argued on the April calendar. Reyes is another case concerning possible resentencing under Senate Bill 1437 , which limited criminal liability for felony murder or murder under the natural-and-probable-consequences doctrine. Briefs here ; oral argument video here.)
The opinions will leave two undecided cases from the eight-case June calendar. There is also one undecided case — a death penalty appeal with post-argument briefing — from the late-May calendar. (Briefs here ; oral argument videos here , here , and here.). The two remaining opinions should file by September 1.
By contrast, there has been no decision yet in any case argued on the April calendar. The change in the law at issue is Senate Bill 136 , which, in 2019, restricted what had been a generally applicable enhancement for prior felony prison and jail terms to one that is now imposed only for those terms served for sexually violent offenses.
These opinions will decide half of the court’s September calendar. a)(6) & (7)) require consecutive terms on multiple current violent or serious felony convictions, regardless of whether the offenses occurred on the same occasion or arose from the same set of operative facts?” In March 2019 , the court agreed in Yahoo!
These will be the last opinions in the four cases argued on the December calendar. d)) was a serious felony (id., §§ 667, subd. (a)(1), Tomorrow morning, the Supreme Court will file its opinions in People v. Brown and In re Cabrera. Briefs here ; oral argument video here and here.) In Brown , the court limited the issues to: “1.
The case involves Senate Bill 1437 , which narrowed murder liability under the felony murder theory and the natural and probable consequences doctrine. Lewis was argued on the late-May calendar and Pollock was argued in early May. The court granted review in March 2020. Tri-Modal Distribution Services.
Now that oral arguments are finished for the term (there won’t be another calendar until September), we’re updating the list. The latest docket entries, in October 2023, show a defense motion — and the People’s response to the motion — to stay the appeal and for a limited remand or, in the alternative, for calendar preference.
The 2018 legislation limited criminal liability for felony murder, eliminated it for murder under the natural-and-probable-consequences doctrine, and allowed possible resentencing for those convicted under pre-SB 1437 law. ” Two votes for review in Three-Strikes resentencing case. Another discovery sanctions grant-and-hold.
When the court granted review in Mitchell in November 2023, it limited the issues to: (1) Does Penal Code section 1238 authorize an appeal by the People from a superior courts post-preliminary hearing, prejudgment order reducing a felony wobbler offense to a misdemeanor? (2) ” More about the case here.
On September 30, the Fourth Circuit tentatively calendared oral argument on the companies’ appeal for the December 10–12 argument session. The court also temporarily enjoined two felony riot statutes because they went “far beyond” the State’s “appropriate interest” in criminalizing participation in a riot with acts of force or violence.
He had been convicted of misdemeanor trespass and felony criminal mischief and conspiracy to commit criminal mischief in October 2017. A second activist who filmed the action was convicted of felony conspiracy to commit criminal mischief and conspiracy trespass, a misdemeanor.
Here is the column: Hunter Biden returned to court today on the felony indictment for his possession of a handgun, including allegations that he lied on an Oct.12, The problem for the case is that Hunter and his counsel appear to have an elastic calendar on his addiction, depending on its value in a given case or controversy.
South Carolina Conference of the NAACP to their merits calendar for the 2023-24 term as well as three other cases, including a dispute arising from former President Donald Trump’s lease of a government-owned building in Washington, D.C., The justices added Alexander v. and two cases involving the Armed Career Criminal Act.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content