Calendaring North Carolina Statute 
JURIST
APRIL 13, 2025
The North Carolina Supreme Court issued an order on Friday in the election protest raised by state Supreme Court candidate Jefferson Griffin. Friday’s ruling upholds the lower court’s order requiring these voters to provide a copy of their ID within 30 calendar days after the “mailing of notice.”
SCOTUSBlog
SEPTEMBER 29, 2023
Fitzgerald , the Supreme Court ruled that a 2017 law that imposes higher fees on bankruptcy filers in 48 states than in North Carolina and Alabama violated the requirement, imposed by the Constitution, that Congress provide uniform bankruptcy laws throughout the United States. In 2022, in Siegel v. In Office of the U.S. 2, at 9:30 a.m.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Broadcast Law Blog
JULY 28, 2021
All broadcasters should have August 11 circled and highlighted on their calendars as the date of the next National EAS Test. federal issue ads) – a requirement that was imposed by statute almost two decades ago and is common practice for broadcast stations but was never reflected in FCC rules.
LawSites
DECEMBER 29, 2021
And it is true that other states continue to look at various reform measures along these same lines, including Colorado, North Carolina and Illinois. July 28 : Clio acquires the automated court-calendaring company CalendarRules. But as we close out of 2021, the regulatory dominoes largely still stand.
LawSites
DECEMBER 29, 2021
And it is true that other states continue to look at various reform measures along these same lines, including Colorado, North Carolina and Illinois. July 28 : Clio acquires the automated court-calendaring company CalendarRules. But as we close out of 2021, the regulatory dominoes largely still stand.
SCOTUSBlog
OCTOBER 18, 2022
That news came with the release of the court’s December argument calendar on Tuesday. Harper , a dispute arising from the North Carolina legislature’s efforts to draw a new congressional map in response to the 2020 census. The justices will hear argument in 303 Creative v. 303 Creative and Moore v. United States (Nov.
JonathanTurley
MARCH 5, 2022
One of the most important cases on the Court’s calendar is a racial discrimination case involving Harvard admissions policies. As the federal recusal statute makes clear, recusal is proper where a judge’s “impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”. It’s whether the public can reasonably and legitimately expect fairness.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
175 
Let's personalize your content