This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System , the justices agreed to decide when the six-year statute of limitations to challenge an action by a federal agency begins to run: Is it when the agency issues the rule, even if the plaintiff has not yet suffered any injury from the action; or is it instead when the plaintiff is actually injured?
Share A pair of challenges to controversial social media laws in Texas and Florida and a dispute over whether to freeze the Environmental Protection Agency’s plan to reduce ozone levels across the United States headline the Supreme Court’s February 2024 argument calendar , which was released on Friday morning. Paxton and Moody v.
The report offered the example of the Texas court system, which had never held a civil hearing by video before the pandemic, but which conducted 1.1 July 28 : Clio acquires the automated court-calendaring company CalendarRules. million remote proceedings (civil and criminal) from March 2020 to February 2021.
The report offered the example of the Texas court system, which had never held a civil hearing by video before the pandemic, but which conducted 1.1 July 28 : Clio acquires the automated court-calendaring company CalendarRules. million remote proceedings (civil and criminal) from March 2020 to February 2021.
Raimondo headline the calendar for the January argument session , which the court released on Friday morning. Natural Resources Defense Council , in which the court held that when a federal statute is ambiguous, courts should defer to an agency’s interpretation of that law as long as it is reasonable. Texas (Jan. Devillier v.
After a few slow weeks on the relist front, the Supreme Court came roaring back this week with four newly relisted petitions that, if granted, will likely be added to the March 2023 argument calendar. District courts have discretion to impose either consecutive or concurrent sentences unless a statute mandates otherwise. 2 conference).
Share With two dozen cases from its 2021-22 term still undecided, the Supreme Court on Tuesday released the first argument calendar for its 2022-23 term. Perhaps because of the abbreviated argument calendar, the court will hold a rare afternoon argument on Oct. During the argument session that begins on Oct. 10, which is Columbus Day.
That news came with the release of the court’s December argument calendar on Tuesday. 28): Whether a defendant can be convicted under the federal wire-fraud statute based on a “right to control” theory – that is, failing to share information that is valuable in making business decisions. Texas (Nov. Texas (Nov.
And at the same time, the Loper Bright case was conspicuously absent from the December argument calendar released on Thursday, even though the case will be fully briefed by the time the argument session begins. In Nieves v. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled that the evidence was not enough to qualify for the Nieves exception.
A few days after the California court issued its order, North Dakota and Texas asked the Wyoming federal court to lift a stay that the court had imposed in December 2017. For these personnel, Sierra Club sought emails, text messages, faxes, voice mails, calendars, and sign-in sheets for meetings involving non-DOI persons.
Share Lee Kovarsky is the Bryant Smith chair in law and co-director of Capital Punishment Center at the University of Texas at Austin. 8 — the new Texas ban on nearly all abortions after the sixth week of pregnancy — have heard some version of the argument. Sovereign immunity precluded suit against Texas itself, S.B.
But with so many relists primed to grant, the court may make substantial inroads on filling its fall argument calendar on the next order list. The court won’t be meeting in conference for four weeks after this Friday. Seven of this week’s relists have something strange in common: All were considered at the court’s Jan. 15 conference.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content