California Cause of Action Contract 
JURIST
FEBRUARY 11, 2022
Following a three-year investigation, California’s Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) sued Tesla Motors and fifty representatives Thursday, alleging its work environment violated the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) and other laws with regard to Black employees. Complaints by direct employees were also discouraged.
At the Lectern
AUGUST 22, 2024
the Supreme Court resolved a question certified by the Ninth Circuit involving the application of California’s economic loss rule. The economic loss rule generally prohibits plaintiffs from recovering tort damages in cases involving breaches of contract that cause only economic losses. Uber Technologies, Inc.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
At the Lectern
JULY 6, 2023
Responding to questions asked by the Ninth Circuit about California law, the court’s unanimous opinion by Justice Carol Corrigan precludes an action alleging a construction worker’s wife contracted COVID from her husband due to his employer’s failure to abide by government health orders at the beginning of the pandemic.
JonathanTurley
SEPTEMBER 22, 2021
Students at California Lutheran University have filed a federal defamation lawsuit against the school for defamation and false light after the school denounced softball players and coaches as racists for a college skit. ” There are 13 claims: FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT.
LawSites
FEBRUARY 22, 2023
In November, Xcential, a 25-person legal technology company in California, fought back, filing an answer and counterclaim denying that its software was based on Agnello’s idea. Further, she said, Xcential’s counterclaims “plausibly implicate actions outside of” Akin’s USPTO petition. In a ruling issued Feb.
The IP Law Blog
MARCH 23, 2023
The license agreement between Evox and Chrome contained a provision that “[n]o action, regardless of form, arising out of this agreement may be brought by either party more than two years after the cause of action arose.” Normally, the statute of limitations for a copyright violation is three years.
Conflict of Laws
JUNE 23, 2024
The South African Supreme Court of Appeal held that “The California Court Orders do not constitute a liquid document evidencing an unconditional acknowledgment of indebtedness, in a fixed sum of money. This is because it had been converted into a liquid and executable money judgment under California law.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
211 
Let's personalize your content