Remove California Remove Compensatory Damages Remove Contract Remove Statute
article thumbnail

October 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

In 2019, the Wyoming federal court stayed these proceedings challenging the Waste Prevention Rule while a challenge to the Trump administration’s repeal of the rule was pending in the federal district court for the Northern District of California. 1442, or the civil-rights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. California v. 19-1189 (U.S.

Court 72
article thumbnail

November 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The First Circuit—like the Fourth, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits in other climate change cases—concluded that the scope of its appellate review was limited to whether the defendants properly removed the case under the federal-officer removal statute. California v. California v. California v. Wheeler , No. 20-1357 (D.C.

article thumbnail

February 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The magistrate judge concluded that the suit was barred by the statute of limitations. The court further found that the plaintiffs conceded that venue in Boulder County was not proper for San Miguel under this statute. WildEarth Guardians v. Mountain Coal Co. , 1:20-cv-01342 (D. 6, 2021); Gallaher v. City of Santa Rosa , No.