This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The Daily Journal today named the recipients of its annual California Lawyer of the Year award. Three of the cases resulted in Supreme Court opinions. One of the three CLAY award Supreme Courtdecisions is Guardianship of Saul H. 5th 93 — “ Missed break premiums count as wages, State Supreme Courtrules.”
The lower court citing Supreme Court precedents in Lathrop v. State Bar of California rejected Taylor’s challenge. The court disagreed and affirmed the lower courtruling stating: Our cases are clear that we may not disregard Supreme Court precedent unless and until it has been overruled by the Court itself.
But, as John Myers reported in the Los Angeles Times last month, partly because it would be only the second gubernatorial recall to make the ballot in California’s history, “[t]here is very little set in stone” about the election’s logistics. They might not even be citable. (Cf.
A California federal judge considering whether to approve Walmart's $35 million deal over allegedly inaccurate wage statements asked the retailer Friday to brief him about adding language tailored to a recent state appellate courtdecision that would limit the settlement's release.
A California state appellate court recently upheld the trial court'sdecision in The 2009 Metropoulos Family Trust v. Franchise Tax Board that nonresident shareholders of an S corporation source gain.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down a decision in California Restaurant Association v. The court overturned a District Courtruling to invalidate a Berkeley, California, prohibition on natural gas infrastructure in newly-constructed buildings. O n Monday, April 17, 2023, the U.S.
As we have written before , Flo and Eddie brought suit against Sirius XM, arguing that the service needs to get permission to make public performances of these recordings and, by not doing so, it violated their California state law copyrights. . This decision, on a summary decision motion, may quite well be appealed.
Dissatisfied with the purchase, Buckley eventually obtained a judgment in a California state court based on the failure of the Bartenwerfers to disclose information about the house on the standard-form Transfer Disclosure Statement. Buckley also emphasizes a Supreme Courtdecision from 1885 (not a typo), Strang v.
We’ve written extensively about copyright issues for audio services, but the big copyright decision that recently made headlines is a TV issue, though one that could have an impact on audio as well. Why, then, did the Courtrule that no public performance was involved?
A Texas state courtruled that the federal law under which Torres brought his suit, the Uniform Services Employment and Re-employment Rights Act , which allows members of the military to sue to remedy employment discrimination based on their service, is unconstitutional. And in LeDure v.
In June, the Supreme Courtruled that the SEC cannot use its administrative authority to impose civil penalties for securities fraud on the ground that these penalties violate the U.S. Sure enough, the first challenge to FDA’s civil money penalty authority was filed last week in the Central District of California. 2117 (2024).
This interesting case comment has been kindly provided to the blog by Nicolás Zambrana-Tévar , LLM, PhD, KIMEP University The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has found in favor of Spain as defendant in a property case spanning several decades.
the Supreme Court today holds a father’s appellate challenge of a juvenile courtruling that his conduct put his son at risk of serious harm was mooted by the juvenile court’s later termination of its jurisdiction. In In re D.P. , Nonetheless, a “jurisdictional finding.
The family courtdecision was reviewed by Judges Stan Pritzker, John Egan Jr., They admit that the rock was “not addressed by family court or the attorney for the child, the mother’s testimony at the hearing, as well as an exhibit admitted into evidence.” California, 283 U. See Stromberg v.
The Tenth Circuit upheld the district courtdecision in favor of the IRS and its authority to conduct the audit. Thomas noted that in 2005 a fractured divided courtruled Gonzales v. Raich , 545 U.S.
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a West Virginia federal district court had erred in concluding that it had jurisdiction to consider the coal company Murray Energy Corporation’s and its affiliates’ lawsuit that sought to compel EPA to conduct evaluations of the Clean Air Act’s employment effects. 16-2432 et al.
This is the question that the Supreme Court of Japan answered in its recent judgment rendered on 25 May 2021. The present case has already yielded an important Supreme Courtdecision rendered on 18 January 2019 (decision available here ). Again, the issue of punitive damages was not raised before the Supreme Court.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court judgment rejecting challenges to San Francisco regulations that dictated which taxi medallion holders could pick up passengers at San Francisco International Airport. Hawaii CourtRuled that Commercial Aquarium Fishing Required Environmental Review. Zepeda , No.
Hill , the Louisiana Supreme Court affirmed a district courtruling that struck down two state statutes — one requiring sex offenders to obtain specialized identification cards (with the words “SEX OFFENDER” in all caps) and the other prohibiting alteration of such identification documents. In Louisiana v. Louisiana v.
Governor Newsom’s Executive Order Expanding on California’s persistent endeavors and substantial financial commitments to combat homelessness, Governor Gavin Newsom took a significant step on July 25, 2024, by issuing an executive order. This decision was prompted by a recent Supreme Courtruling in City of Grants Pass v.
As is frequently the case when the court denies review in cases that have been relisted repeatedly, denial occasioned dissent, this time from Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch. The court relisted Escobar back in June 2024 and has been holding it ever since, pending the resolution of Glossip.
It was in response to the Supreme Courtdecision Kelo v. In that case, the courtruled that the government could take someone’s property for private economic development under the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Claus, saying it qualified as a “public use.” New London.
Supreme Court, the Ninth Circuit explained that he faced “ ‘a “difficult to meet,” and “highly deferential standard for evaluating state-courtrulings, which demands that state-courtdecisions be given the benefit of the doubt.”
In a 6-3 decision Ex parte Danny Richard Lane , the state’s highest criminal appeals courtruled that Texas’ historical doctrine of “judicial clemency” does not forgive sex offender registration. In September 2018, Lane challenged his 2007 conviction for failure to register based on the new appeals courtdecision.
The court’s opinion is authored by Justice Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar. and California Supreme Courtdecisions holding it unconstitutional for an attorney to racially discriminate in peremptorily challenging prospective jurors. Justice Goodwin Liu dissents, claiming Batson / Wheeler error, named after U.S.
4, 1996, Benning twice called 911 and said a burglar broke into her Santa Ana, California, apartment, stabbed her boyfriend to death and slashed her hand before running off into the night. But when prosecutors cross the line and intentionally circumvent courtrules for evidence standards, he said, that’s cause for concern.
Recently, University of California President Janet Napolitano announced that the entire system will no longer base admissions on standardized tests — joining a “test-blind” admissions movement nationally. The Supreme Court is also considering whether to take the case of Students for Fair Admissions v. No more “soft” criteria.
It’s time again (actually, past time) to look at how the California Supreme Court fared at the U.S. Supreme Court during the latter’s most recent term, which ended last month. Gregg and Seifu had been grant-and-holds in the California Supreme Court, which later dismissed review without opinions.
Courts too have recognized how seemingly innocuous phrases may convey profane messages. A county court in San Diego, California referred an attorney to the State Bar when counsel, during a hearing, twice directed the phrase “See You Next Tuesday” toward two female attorneys. ” (Am I the A**hole?)….
Former President Donald Trump filed an appeal Wednesday asking the US Supreme Court to reverse the Colorado Supreme Courtdecision barring him from the state’s ballot. The original decision will now be on hold until the US Supreme Courtrules on the appeal. Trump also appealed the Maine decision.
The justices considered the case at four consecutive conferences before issuing an order on Monday that vacated the state court’sruling and sent the case back to the lower court for reconsideration in light of last summer’s decision in Fulton v.
On the other hand, 16 states protect access to abortion through various methods, such as state constitutional amendments and laws that protect the right to privacy, state supreme courtdecisions interpreting equal protection to include reproductive care, and statutes that protect access to reproductive care.
The federal courtruled resoundingly in favor of SIFMA, finding for plaintiffs on all counts. Perhaps most significantly, the legal grounds for corporate climate risk disclosure requirements promulgated by the SEC and the state of California will also soon be tested in court.
Under the Endangered Species Act, the court vacated the FWS’s biological opinion because the incidental take statement lacked “the requisite specificity of mitigation measures for the polar bear” and because the take finding for the polar bear was arbitrary and capricious. People of State of California v. Army Corps of Engineers , No.
Minnesota Supreme Court Declined to Review Claims Regarding Environmental Review for Oil Pipeline. The Minnesota Supreme Court denied petitions for further review of an appellate courtdecision finding all but one aspect of the environmental review for the Enbridge Line 3 oil pipeline project to be adequate. filed Sept.
His 2022 report , in the aftermath of the courtsdecision overturning the constitutional right to abortion, stressed the importance of judicial security. A California man, Nicholas Roske, is scheduled to stand trial in Maryland next year on charges that he attempted to assassinate Justice Brett Kavanaugh in 2022.
Rosas Judge Collins / Ninth Circuit / December 10, 2021 Case Overview The case involved Arroyo, a person with a disability, who filed a lawsuit against Rosas for violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the California Unruh Act, which prohibits discrimination based on disability.
They contended that it would seem to follow from Apprendi that a jury must find any facts necessary to support a (nonzero) restitution order, and they suggested that the court should take up a lower courtruling to the contrary. Judicial factfinding for restitution Under Apprendi v. Relisted after the Jan. 10 conference.)
Federal Court Denied Oakland and San Francisco Motions to Return Climate Change Nuisance Cases to State Court; Found Federal Common Law of Nuisance Could Apply, Despite AEP v. On March 1, the court set a schedule for motions to dismiss, with the parties’ briefing to be completed by April 10. People of State of California v.
It is noteworthy, South Carolina contends, that until now the Supreme Court has only found four provisions that clearly create privately enforceable rights. Pointing to the Supreme Courts 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Two years ago, in Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County, Ind.
Justice Sotomayor dissented, writing that she believed the Court’s interpretation would allow defendants to “sidestep” the general bar on appellate review by “shoehorning” a civil rights or federal officer removal argument into their case for removal. California v. Federal Court Upheld Environmental Review for Forest Thinning Project.
The question came to the court in the case of Ryan Carter , who was a member of the Air National Guard when he underwent spine surgery at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Md., A federal district court dismissed Carters claims, relying on the courtsdecision in Feres. In Woodward v.
Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”. The Ninth Circuit declined to remand with instructions for dismissal of the underlying action and also declined to vacate any district courtdecisions. Haaland , No.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content