California Court Decisions Litigating Statute 
Conflict of Laws
MAY 17, 2023
There are state courts and federal courts, state statutes and federal statutes, state common law and federal common law. This feeling of pity is compounded when I imagine this same lawyer trying to advise her client as to whether a choice-of-court clause will be enforced by a court in the United States.
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 23, 2023
Share Friday’s decision in Coinbase v. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in California that had rejected a party’s efforts to force a putative class action out of court and into arbitration. The case turns on a 1988 amendment to the Federal Arbitration Act, which added the current Section 16(a) to that statute.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
SCOTUSBlog
FEBRUARY 21, 2022
The Supreme Court first addressed the problem squarely in its 1987 decision in California v. That decision distinguishes between types of gambling that a state prohibits outright and types of gambling that a state tolerates subject to regulation. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians.
SCOTUSBlog
OCTOBER 6, 2021
Under AEPDA, habeas relief is only available to a prisoner whose claims were adjudicated on the merits in state court if the prisoner can show that the last reasoned state court decision was contrary to or involved an unreasonable application of Supreme Court precedent. California. Pliler and Davis v.
Patently O
OCTOBER 5, 2022
Courts to obtain discovery in order to facilitate foreign litigation; with the pending global litigation between Eli Lilly and Novartis serving as our key example. The standard today is that prior to trial the litigating parties will share “mutual knowledge of all relevant facts.” ” Hickman v.
At the Lectern
MAY 1, 2024
On Tuesday and Wednesday, May 21 and 22, in San Francisco, the court will hear the following cases (with the issue presented as summarized by court staff or limited by the court itself ): Castellanos v. In March of this year, the court heard argument in another COVID insurance case, Another Planet Entertainment, LLC v.
SCOTUSBlog
DECEMBER 7, 2022
After a few slow weeks on the relist front, the Supreme Court came roaring back this week with four newly relisted petitions that, if granted, will likely be added to the March 2023 argument calendar. The 9th Circuit placed Hansen’s case on hold while the Supreme Court considered its Sineneng-Smith ruling. Next up is Lora v.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content