Remove California Remove Court Decisions Remove Litigation
article thumbnail

US judge temporarily blocks California law that bans concealed carry of handguns in most public places

JURIST

Carney issued a preliminary injunction on Wednesday blocking a California law that prohibits concealed carry permit holders from carrying firearms in most public places. The case is in the US District Court for the Central District of California. This is not the only litigation involving California gun laws.

Laws 249
article thumbnail

Who Escapes Texas? And Where Do They Go? Mandamus Petitioners and Transferee Courts in Patent Venue Disputes

Patently O

Litigants shouldn’t get to choose the judge who decides their case. Judge shopping, we’ve argued elsewhere , raises concerns about court bias and capture and can make litigation unnecessarily costly and inefficient. This is the second in a new series on venue transfer requests and mandamus at the Federal Circuit. of the time.

Court 116
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Are two unpublished Supreme Court decisions on recall elections precedential?

At the Lectern

But, as John Myers reported in the Los Angeles Times last month, partly because it would be only the second gubernatorial recall to make the ballot in California’s history, “[t]here is very little set in stone” about the election’s logistics. They might not even be citable. (Cf.

article thumbnail

Collateral Estoppel Beats Precedent Every Time

Patently O

This means that issues decided at the district or administrative court level can be binding on all other courts: district courts, administrative courts, appellate courts, and even the Supreme Court. District court decisions are not binding precedent because they are at the bottom.

article thumbnail

New York City’s Building Electrification Law Wins in District Court

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

This blog post discusses Local Law 154, unpacks Judge Abrams decision, and ends with a refresher on California Restaurant Association v. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, held that EPCA preempted a Berkeley ordinance that prohibited natural gas piping in new buildings. California Restaurant Association v.

Laws 59
article thumbnail

Wrong Legal Standard Applied In RICO Suit, 9th Circ. Rules

Law 360

The Ninth Circuit on Friday revived litigation from a Chinese company suing under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act over a California supplement maker's allegedly defective products, citing a U.S. Supreme Court decision in concluding a domestic injury was suffered since the pills were delivered in Los Angeles.

Legal 52
article thumbnail

Evaluating Calif. Law On Litigation During Arbitration Appeals

Law 360

While a recently enacted California law makes it possible for cases to proceed to trial in state court even while appeal of an arbitration denial is pending, the legislation may be preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act and a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision, says Benny Osorio at Signature Resolution.