ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JULY 6, 2017

Circuit also rejected EPA’s argument that the court did not have authority to review stays issued under Section 307(d)(7)(D) of the Clean Air Act. The Fourth Circuit also dismissed as moot an environmental group’s appeal of the district court’s denial of its motion to intervene. California Chamber of Commerce v.

Court 40

Court Litigation Litigating Attorney 40

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

DECEMBER 11, 2020

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court judgment rejecting challenges to San Francisco regulations that dictated which taxi medallion holders could pick up passengers at San Francisco International Airport. 1:20-cv-00056 (D.D.C. Union of Concerned Scientists v. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration , No.

Court 55

Court Government Litigation Litigating 55

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JANUARY 13, 2021

1442, or the civil-rights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. The district court rejected eight grounds for removal, but the Fourth Circuit concluded its appellate jurisdiction was limited to determining whether the companies properly removed the case under the federal-officer removal statute. Minnesota v. 20-cv-1636 (D. BP p.l.c.

Court 52

Court Government Technology Assisted Review Litigation 52

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

MARCH 6, 2018

Federal Court Denied Oakland and San Francisco Motions to Return Climate Change Nuisance Cases to State Court; Found Federal Common Law of Nuisance Could Apply, Despite AEP v. On March 1, the court set a schedule for motions to dismiss, with the parties’ briefing to be completed by April 10. People of State of California v.

Court 40

Court Government Laws Litigation 40