Remove California Remove Court Rules Remove Felony Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Supreme Court will answer teed-up bail questions and decide felony-murder resentencing issue; it depublishes arbitration opinion

At the Lectern

2) May a superior court ever set pretrial bail above an arrestee’s ability to pay? The cases concern resentencing a defendant whose felony-murder conviction is tossed under subsequent legislation narrowing the felony-murder rule. ” The Supreme Court denied the defendant’s petition for review in Howard.

Felony 40
article thumbnail

Court rejects non-citizen’s challenge to criminal re-entry charge

SCOTUSBlog

Eight years later, an immigration judge found that his California conviction for driving under the influence was an aggravated felony under the federal immigration laws. But six years after his deportation, the Supreme Court ruled in Leocal v. The direct implications of the court’s ruling are likely quite narrow.

Court 133
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

US Supreme Court rules states lack constitutional standing in key immigration case

JURIST

The US Supreme Court ruled Friday in US v. The crux of the case rests on Article III of the US Constitution, which governs the Court’s judicial purview. The US District Court Southern District of Texas ruled in favor of the states, enjoining Homeland Security from enforcing the memorandum.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court will resolve conflict about co-tenancy leasing requirements (and about punctuation?)

At the Lectern

The legislative change came after the superior court sentenced the defendant. ” The dissent criticized the majority for improperly “substituting its judgment for that of the trial court.” The dissent claimed “section 1109 is not an ameliorative statute. Superior Court (2000) 80 Cal.App.4th

Court 60
article thumbnail

A second look at a death-row prisoner’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim

SCOTUSBlog

Ross , involving a dormant commerce clause challenge to a California law prohibiting the sale of pork unless the pigs from which it was made (virtually all of which come from outside the state) were raised consistent with the state’s restrictive standards. On remand, the Texas court ruled that the inadequate counsel had not prejudiced Andrus.

article thumbnail

Intellectual property and Navajo water rights

SCOTUSBlog

The Supreme Court has held that the federal government assumes a trust obligation to assert reserved water rights for Native tribes only when it “ expressly accepts those responsibilities by statute ,” by regulation, or by treaty with a tribe. Issues : (1) Whether the doctrine of Chevron U.S.A., Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.

article thumbnail

First Amendment questions and California arbitration battles

SCOTUSBlog

Next, we explore the bounds of the Federal Arbitration Act, with a pair of petitions arguing that California’s efforts to restrict arbitration agreements undermine federal law. Rollins challenges a Massachusetts law that makes it a felony to secretly record the speech of anyone other than a law enforcement officer, irrespective of motive.

Felony 134