Remove California Remove Court Rules Remove Misdemeanor
article thumbnail

US Supreme Court ruling limits when police officers can enter home without warrant

JURIST

The US Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled unanimously in Lange v. California that, under the Fourth Amendment, pursuit of a fleeing misdemeanor suspect does not always or categorically qualify as an exigent circumstance justifying warrantless entry into a home.

article thumbnail

Court declines to endorse warrantless entries in all “hot pursuits” for misdemeanors

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday that when police are pursuing someone for a misdemeanor, that pursuit does not automatically create the kind of emergency that allows the officer to follow the suspect into a home without a warrant. But a California appeals court rejected that argument.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

“‘Hot Pursuit’ Doesn’t Always Justify Entry, Supreme Court Rules; The mere flight of a person suspected of a minor crime, without more, does not allow police officers to enter homes without warrants, the court said”

HowAppealing

“‘Hot Pursuit’ Doesn’t Always Justify Entry, Supreme Court Rules; The mere flight of a person suspected of a minor crime, without more, does not allow police officers to enter homes without warrants, the court said”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. ” David G.

article thumbnail

California Launches Nation’s First-Ever Anti-Gun-Violence Office

The Crime Report

A new Office of Gun Violence Prevention in California will reduce gun violence by keeping guns away from “dangerous individuals” and promoting research and data collection, the Washington Post reports. People with felony or violent misdemeanor convictions, restraining orders, or serious mental illness are all included on the list.

article thumbnail

“An argument for zero-based state constitutional interpretation”

At the Lectern

Nick Scheuerman writes on SCOCAblog , the online publication of the California Constitution Center at Berkeley Law and of the UC Law Journal , that “the California Supreme Court generally does not interpret the California constitution independently [of the federal constitution]. Supreme Court has said or might say.

article thumbnail

Democratic Governor Calls For Criminalizing “Lying” About Election Results

JonathanTurley

” He would make such comments a gross misdemeanor subject to incarceration. Alvarez , the Court held 6-3 that it is unconstitutional to criminalize lies — in that case lying about receiving military decorations or medals. We have seen other Democratic leaders use the criminal process in similarly reckless fashions.

article thumbnail

A no-straight-grant Wednesday conference

At the Lectern

Supreme Court, which, in reversing a First District, Division Five, decision ( People v. A157169) 2019 WL 5654385, review denied ), held that pursuit of a fleeing misdemeanor suspect did not categorically allow the police to enter a home without a warrant. California (2021) 141 S.Ct. Lange (Oct. 30, 2019, No. 2011, 210 L.Ed.2d