This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The statute at issue bars debtors from discharging debts “for money…obtained by…fraud.” ” The courtruled that because the statute’s text is written in the passive voice, the statute turns on how the money was obtained, not who committed the fraud to obtain the money.
The US Supreme Court declined Monday to take up an appeal by a group of oil companies challenging a California state courtruling permitting two California cities to sue for damages related to climate change, meaning the case will be heard in state court.
Eight years later, he was deported on the basis of a California conviction for driving under the influence. But after his deportation, the Supreme Courtruled in Leocal v. Ashcroft that, under the relevant federal statute, DUI convictions do not provide grounds for the removal of people like Palomar-Santiago.
California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. On Friday, the justices agreed to decide whether the Nollan / Dolan test applies to a California man’s challenge to a development fee, or whether – as a California appeals courtruled – the fee is instead immune from such review because it was authorized by legislation.
Eight years later, an immigration judge found that his California conviction for driving under the influence was an aggravated felony under the federal immigration laws. But six years after his deportation, the Supreme Courtruled in Leocal v. The direct implications of the court’sruling are likely quite narrow.
Dissatisfied with the purchase, Buckley eventually obtained a judgment in a California state court based on the failure of the Bartenwerfers to disclose information about the house on the standard-form Transfer Disclosure Statement. The statute refers to the discharge of “any” debt obtained by “fraud.”
Netflix and Hulu have again beaten a proposed class action from a California city claiming the streaming providers should be regulated like cable companies and pay franchise fees to localities, with a state appeals courtruling the city had no right to private action under a 2006 statute.
On June 15, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States issued an 8-1 decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. Moriana, holding that an employee's individual claims for penalties.
From the news release by Karen Datangel: “This February, Californiacourts and the Judicial Council of California join the nation in recognizing Black History Month. of California judges identify as Black or African American , compared to 4.6% Lee later got his freedom from a federal courtruling.
As we have written before , Flo and Eddie brought suit against Sirius XM, arguing that the service needs to get permission to make public performances of these recordings and, by not doing so, it violated their California state law copyrights. . The issue is also before many other courts, both in California and elsewhere.
But then, on October 19, 2021, Joseph Ryan, an attorney from Palos Verdes Estates, filed a complaint against the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, arguing that the transfer of Bruce’s Beach to the Bruce family is an unconstitutional “gift” under Section 6 of Article 16 of the California Constitution. A Case Study in Judicial Analytics.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down a decision in California Restaurant Association v. The court overturned a District Courtruling to invalidate a Berkeley, California, prohibition on natural gas infrastructure in newly-constructed buildings. O n Monday, April 17, 2023, the U.S.
Share The Supreme Court on Friday substantially narrowed a class action against TransUnion , one of the nation’s three major credit-reporting companies. Friday’s ruling in TransUnion v. Ramirez came in a dispute that arose when a California man, Sergio Ramirez, attempted to buy a car. The Supreme Courtruled in Spokeo v.
Golden State whistleblower statutes shield workers from retaliation for disclosing wrongdoing even if the report recipient already knows about the alleged misconduct, the California Supreme Courtruled Monday.
Share The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. Four years ago, the Supreme Courtruled in Nieves v. City of El Dorado, California 22-1074 Issue : Whether a building-permit exaction is exempt from the unconstitutional-conditions doctrine as applied in Nollan v.
This interesting case comment has been kindly provided to the blog by Nicolás Zambrana-Tévar , LLM, PhD, KIMEP University The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has found in favor of Spain as defendant in a property case spanning several decades.
Adopt American Bar Association Rules for Defining Prosecutorial Misconduct. Judges should certify that the “Brady rule,” mandated under a 1963 Supreme Courtruling, is followed at each criminal trial. Some 23 states have adopted these verbatim or with some modifications. Certify Compliance.
But Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero is hopeful output will increase over the second half so that the court will exceed current projections. Guerrero, along with new Judicial Council Administrative Director Shelley Curran , spoke at her first meeting with the press since becoming California’s chief justice just over a year ago.
It was a busy conference, however, the courtruling on 176 matters. Acrisure of California, LLC v. Superior Court is another grant-and-hold for EpicentRx, Inc. Here are some of the notable actions. Another f orum selection grant-and-hold. In People v.
subdivision (c) and rule 8.392(b) of the CaliforniaRules of Court, or whether the matter should be remanded to the superior court so it may in the first instance decide whether the petition or its claims are successive under section 1509, subdivision (d), and if so whether to issue a certificate of appealability under section 1509.1,
except the alternative writ’s recipient is a Court of Appeal. The subject of the proceeding is one that is near and dear to the hearts of California’s appellate practitioners — whether parties to an appeal have the unfettered right to stipulate to a 60-day extension of a briefing deadline.
It was a light Supreme Court conference yesterday, with the courtruling on only 64 matters. The court agreed to hear People v. But there were some notable actions, including: Statements made to undercover police agent. Orozco (2019) 32 Cal.App.5th In People v.
California (2021) 141 S.Ct. In a rare ruling, the court granted review in Munoz v. The statute proscribes a reviewing court from “render[ing] a decision in a proceeding. ” The Supreme Court’s order depublishes the appellate court’s opinion. 2011, 210 L.Ed.2d
It was a big double conference; the courtruled on 171 matters. This Part I reports on some of the highlights: Posthumous pardon recommendation Supreme Court approves posthumous pardon for Medal of Honor recipient. and California Supreme Court case law (see Adolph v. Uber Technologies, Inc. 2023) 14 Cal.5th
This decision comes on the heels of a decision the decision by the US District Court in Washington DC finding that Aereo-like service FilmOn X was violating the copyrights of TV stations by operating a similar service in the DC area (see our discussion of that decision here ).
The article also states, “It is critically important to understand the labyrinth of potentially applicable ethics rules that intertwine with certain courtrules on retirement.”. Rulings on this will differ from state to state. When Do Lawyers Retire? According to the U.S. is 65 for men and 63 for women.
The US Supreme Courtruled Friday in US v. The crux of the case rests on Article III of the US Constitution, which governs the Court’s judicial purview. The US District Court Southern District of Texas ruled in favor of the states, enjoining Homeland Security from enforcing the memorandum.
2) May a superior court ever set pretrial bail above an arrestee’s ability to pay? Specifically, the issue is whether a court, when resentencing for the felony underlying the vacated felony-murder conviction, can include an enhancement related to the underlying felony. Rules of Court, rule 8.528(d); In re Benoit (1973) 10 Cal.3d
Circuit also rejected EPA’s argument that the court did not have authority to review stays issued under Section 307(d)(7)(D) of the Clean Air Act. The district courtruled that EPA was required to conduct such evaluations in October 2016 and set an expedited schedule for EPA’s compliance. California Chamber of Commerce v.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court judgment rejecting challenges to San Francisco regulations that dictated which taxi medallion holders could pick up passengers at San Francisco International Airport. Hawaii CourtRuled that Commercial Aquarium Fishing Required Environmental Review. Zepeda , No.
Hill , the Louisiana Supreme Court affirmed a district courtruling that struck down two state statutes — one requiring sex offenders to obtain specialized identification cards (with the words “SEX OFFENDER” in all caps) and the other prohibiting alteration of such identification documents. HRB Tax Group, Inc.
Thirty years later, in the second law, the Oregon and California Railroad and Coos Bay Wagon Road Grant Lands Act of 1937 , Congress directed the Interior Department to enforce sustainable harvesting of timber in a broad swath – nearly 2.6 Biden , the challengers ask the justices to grant review and reverse the lower courts’ rulings.
This week, we highlight cert petitions that ask the court to consider, among other things, whether hedonic damages are consistent with the federal statute permitting lawsuits against state officials for civil rights violations. A federal district court in California upheld the award in full, holding that a 2014 decision by the U.S.
He first started sketching Supreme Court arguments in the 1977-78 term, when Regents of the University of California v. The question is whether a 1987 federal statute subjects certain Indian tribes in Texas to that state’s entire body of gambling law. Bakke , an affirmative-action case, was decided.
The Supreme Court has held that the federal government assumes a trust obligation to assert reserved water rights for Native tribes only when it “ expressly accepts those responsibilities by statute ,” by regulation, or by treaty with a tribe. Issues : (1) Whether the doctrine of Chevron U.S.A., Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
The legislative change came after the superior court sentenced the defendant. ” The dissent criticized the majority for improperly “substituting its judgment for that of the trial court.” The dissent claimed “section 1109 is not an ameliorative statute. Superior Court (2000) 80 Cal.App.4th
Then, in 2009 , the California Supreme Courtruled that the callousness of the original crime couldn’t be a parole board’s sole criterion for denying a person freedom. Four years later, California Gov. He’s now married and employed in Berkeley, California, as a substance abuse counselor and program supervisor.
the Supreme Court today upholds the dismissal without trial of negligence, wrongful death, and elder abuse claims against a Medicare Advantage HMO and plan administrator for the alleged premature discharge of an 85-year-old man from a skilled nursing facility. A federal Medicare statute preempts those claims, the court concludes.
Writing that “California law over the last few decades. has not been a friend of arbitration,” the dissent said, “By again putting arbitration on the chopping block, this statute invites a seventh reprimand from the Supreme Court of the United States.” The court also agreed to hear Shear Development Co.
United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain issued a ruling in New York to apply Virginia’s choice of law standard that in turn applied California’s defamation laws. In my torts class, I teach defamation and often discuss the California retraction law. It was a cascading deconstruction of the lawsuit.
In a 6-3 decision Ex parte Danny Richard Lane , the state’s highest criminal appeals courtruled that Texas’ historical doctrine of “judicial clemency” does not forgive sex offender registration. In 1987, the trial court “set aside” the rape conviction through a “judicial clemency” order.
Supreme Court lets stand order removing superior court judge from the bench. In June we wrote the California Racial Justice Act ( here and here ) “is a good candidate to be the next big thing on the courts docket. Rules of Court, rule 8.528(d); see In re Benoit (1973) 10 Cal.3d Judge removed.
Ross , involving a dormant commerce clause challenge to a California law prohibiting the sale of pork unless the pigs from which it was made (virtually all of which come from outside the state) were raised consistent with the state’s restrictive standards. On remand, the Texas courtruled that the inadequate counsel had not prejudiced Andrus.
Regents of University of California , which I teach in my torts class. In this case, the courtruled that that burden was not satisfied. The court distinguished between the duty to the mother as opposed to the girlfriend: Here, it is uncontroverted that Loyd never actually communicated to Benton that he intended to harm Melissa.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content