This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The California Supreme Court held Monday that prisoners are entitled to a lawyer before a trial court can consider their record of conviction in determining whether the prisoners may challenge their murder convictions for killings committed by others. The new law in question was California Senate Bill No.
There were actions of note at the Supreme Court’s conference yesterday, uncommonly held during the same week as it heard oral arguments. Those actions included: Supreme Court will hear Prop. Supreme Court OKs LWOP commutation. Resentencing primafaciecase. 22 challenge. COVID insurance.
Racial Justice Act dissenting vote Justice Goodwin Liu wanted to issue an order to show cause in In re Manjikian , but he was the only member of the court who did. 5th 834, the Supreme Court found unavailing an equal protection attack. In People v. Hardin (2024) 15 Cal.5th See here and recently here.) Public Employment Relations Board.
The Supreme Court yesterday denied review in In re Mendoza , a pro per’s petition for review seeking discovery and appointment of counsel under the California Racial Justice Act ( here and here ). ” The dissenters claim that the court’s “inaction portends a silent evisceration of the RJA.”
The Supreme Court today barely denied review in In re Banks , with Justices Goodwin Liu, Leondra Kruger, and Kelli Evans voting to grant and send the case to the Court of Appeal for issuance of an order to show cause on a pro per’s habeas corpus petition seeking relief under the California Racial Justice Act ( here and here ).
At the Supreme Court’s conference yesterday, actions of note included: Supreme Court allows Governor to commute murder sentence. The court issued writs of review in California-American Water Company v. The court also granted review in People v. Superior Court. The court denied review in People v.
At the Supreme Court’s Wednesday conference , a double one, actions of note included: Retail lease. The court agreed to hear JJD-HOV Elk Grove, LLC v. The appellate court disagreed with the Fifth District’s decision in Grand Prospect Partners, L.P. The court also granted review in People v. 2015) 232 Cal.App.4th
At the Supreme Court’s conference yesterday, there were no straight grants , but there were some actions of note, including: Racial Justice Act. The court yesterday denied review and a depublication request in one case involving that legislation, Mosby v. Superior Court , which attracted significant amicus curiae interest.
The Supreme Court today affirms the death sentence in People v. The court’s opinion is authored by Justice Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar. and California Supreme Court decisions holding it unconstitutional for an attorney to racially discriminate in peremptorily challenging prospective jurors.
For a second week, the Supreme Court didn’t straight grant any cases at its conference yesterday, and the number of other highlights was small. 2) Did the Court of Appeal act in excess of its jurisdiction in granting relief under traditional mandate (Code Civ. Criminal case grant-and-holds. Here and here.)
At its conference yesterday , a double one, the Supreme Court backed up Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero’s recent pledge that a decline in straight grants would be temporary. It issued straight grant orders in five cases. We can’t remember the last time the court at one conference agreed to hear that many cases.
A divided Supreme Court today upholds the death sentence in People v. Supreme Court’s Batson decision and the California Supreme Court’s Wheeler decision establish that it’s unconstitutional for an attorney to racially discriminate in peremptorily challenging prospective jurors. ” ’ [Citation.]
When looking at the judges appointed by both presidents, it is clear that their circuit court appointees show distinct patterns in terms of gender, race, and geographic representation. Court of Appeals circuits, including the Ninth, Fifth, and Seventh Circuits. The average vote differential for Trumps circuit court judges was 23.2.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content