Remove California Remove Demurrer Remove Laws Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Boohoo Group Says it Has Reached a Preliminary Settlement in Case Over “Fraudulent” Reference Pricing

The Fashion Law

District Court [for the Central District of California] that they have agreed to the terms of a preliminary settlement relating to the [plaintiffs’] claims,” a representative for Manchester, UK-based Boohoo Group revealed on Thursday. Boohoo is pleased to report that the parties have notified the [U.S.] The Defendants’ Answers.

Statute 64
article thumbnail

A double conference with no straight grants, but some significant denials

At the Lectern

The dissent specifically urged the Supreme Court to grant review on its own motion (see rule 8.512 (c)(1)), as did the California District Attorneys Association, but the court declined. ” (Emphasis added.) ” (Emphasis added.) ” (Emphases added.) ” (Emphases added.) Facebook discrimination case can continue.

article thumbnail

Gang enhancements, union protections, racially biased prosecutions, the Second Amendment, Michael Jackson, and more at the Supreme Court’s conference

At the Lectern

The legislation amended the law regarding gang enhancements. The court wants a Court of Appeal opinion on the constitutionality of a state statute barring public employers from discouraging union membership. California Racial Justice Act. He argued that the statute criminalizing his conduct violates the Second Amendment.