SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 14, 2023

Congress extended the Immigration and Nationality Act, which regulates immigration into the United States, in 1988 to give immigration enforcement authorities, now the Department of Homeland Security, the power to automatically deport noncitizens convicted of an “aggravated felony” at the state or federal level.

Immigration 111

Immigration Statute Felony Court 111

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 24, 2021

Eight years later, an immigration judge found that his California conviction for driving under the influence was an aggravated felony under the federal immigration laws. Ashcroft that, under the relevant federal statute, DUI convictions like Palomar-Santiago’s are not aggravated felonies.

Court 133

Court Felony Immigration Statute 133

At the Lectern

MAY 18, 2022

The case presents issues relating to petitions for Special Immigrant Findings under Code of Civil Procedure section 155. Whether a court lacks jurisdiction under article XIII B, section 6 of the California Constitution to make subvention findings on statutes that were not specifically identified in an initial test claim.

Calendaring 49

Calendaring Felony Statute Court 49

JURIST

JUNE 24, 2023

Texas that Texas and Louisiana do not have constitutional standing to sue the federal government over a 2021 Homeland Security Memorandum that focuses immigration enforcement actions on non-citizens who are suspected of terrorism, committed serious crimes or are caught at the border entering illegally.

Immigration 211

Immigration Court Rules Court Statute 211

At the Lectern

AUGUST 19, 2021

A concurring opinion in Leon notes that the Ninth Circuit has relied on the Supreme Court decision to construe the immunity narrowly so that “the same issue of California law likely would be decided differently in a federal courthouse.” Menetrez, a former Horvitz & Levy attorney, wrote the article before becoming a judge.

Court 40

Court Laws Court Decisions Felony 40

The Crime Report

JANUARY 6, 2023

With the decriminalization of jaywalking in Nevada , Virginia and now California — the “ Freedom to Walk ” Act will take effect in Los Angeles in the new year — it appears that people understand this when it comes to jaywalking, but not when it comes to immigration. . Controlling Movement. In 1969, the Supreme Court held in Shapiro v.

Immigration 114

Immigration Laws Misdemeanor Government 114

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 8, 2024

8 for a packed session of oral arguments – starting with immigration policy and the post-9/11 “No Fly List” and ending on Jan. The statute includes a list of information the government must include – most notably, the time and place of the removal hearing. California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. Garland and Garland v. .

Government 91

Government Statute Court Cause of Action 91