article thumbnail

California Supreme Court: prisoners must get lawyer when challenging convictions for killings committed by others

JURIST

The California Supreme Court held Monday that prisoners are entitled to a lawyer before a trial court can consider their record of conviction in determining whether the prisoners may challenge their murder convictions for killings committed by others. The new law in question was California Senate Bill No.

article thumbnail

Racial Justice Act catch-22 is claimed by separate statement dissenting from a somewhat puzzling order denying review

At the Lectern

The Supreme Court yesterday denied review in In re Mendoza , a pro per’s petition for review seeking discovery and appointment of counsel under the California Racial Justice Act ( here and here ). ” The dissenters claim that the court’s “inaction portends a silent evisceration of the RJA.”

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court to decide Prop. 22 challenge and another SB 1437 resentencing case [Updated]

At the Lectern

Resentencing prima facie case. Reyes , one of many cases concerning possible resentencing under Senate Bill 1437 (more about today’s Reyes decision later [ update : here ]), the court agreed to take on yet another SB 1437 case, People v. Those actions included: Supreme Court will hear Prop. 22 challenge.

article thumbnail

Another Racial Justice Act dissenting statement

At the Lectern

The Supreme Court today barely denied review in In re Banks , with Justices Goodwin Liu, Leondra Kruger, and Kelli Evans voting to grant and send the case to the Court of Appeal for issuance of an order to show cause on a pro per’s habeas corpus petition seeking relief under the California Racial Justice Act ( here and here ).

article thumbnail

Supreme Court will hear challenges to PUC water rate decisions

At the Lectern

The court issued writs of review in California-American Water Company v. ” The dissent asserted the defendant had made a prima facie case of, and was thus entitled to a hearing on, racial discrimination in charging Black defendants with felony-murder special circumstance penalty enhancements in Orange County.

article thumbnail

No straight grants at yesterday’s conference

At the Lectern

Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero has cited the California Racial Justice Act ( here and here ) as one of the “important landmark new laws” that is “impacting [the court’s] workflow.” The court yesterday denied review and a depublication request in one case involving that legislation, Mosby v.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court affirms death penalty, with a Batson dissent

At the Lectern

and California Supreme Court decisions holding it unconstitutional for an attorney to racially discriminate in peremptorily challenging prospective jurors. The superior court ruled the defendant had not made even a prima facie case of discrimination and thus did not require the prosecutor to justify his challenge.