This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The Supreme Court of Canada ruled 5-4 on Friday that Canada’s Constitution protects Canadians’ internet protocol (IP) addresses from unreasonable search. Therefore, Canadians’ IP addresses attract a reasonable expectation of privacy and are therefore constitutionally protected from unreasonable search.
The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) announced Thursday that it will jointly investigate OpenAI, the company behind the artificial intelligence chatbot “ChatGPT,” with provincial privacy authorities in British Columbia, Alberta, and Quebec.
The National Security and Intelligence Review Agency (NSIRA) of Canada announced that the Communications Security Establishment’s (CSE) use of polygraphs for security screening during the hiring process likely breaches the privacy rights of prospective employees.
The privacy challenge targets section 103 of the British Columbia Police Act, which allows judges to authorize searches on certain premises that may potentially contain evidence of police misconduct.
The Supreme Court of Canada affirmed on Friday that Ontario public school board teachers are entitled to protection against unreasonable search and seizure in their workplace under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The school board then sought recourse at the Supreme Court of Canada, which ultimately dismissed the appeal.
The Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner (OPIC) of Canada published on Thursday the findings of its investigation into Alcanna Inc.’s ” The post Canadaprivacy regulator finds ID scanning technology at Alberta liquor stores are illegal appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary.
As the global data privacy law patchwork continues to expand, companies need to think beyond the U.S. and European Union and ensure they're paying attention to places such as India and Canada, which are inching toward enacting laws with major penalties and tight data transfer restrictions.
The Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Canada, a charitable religious corporation representing Jehovah’s Witnesses across Canada, alleges the application of BC’s privacy legislation, PIPA , violates their constitutional right to religious freedom under sections 2 and 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Canada'sprivacy regulator is making policing "fast-moving technologies" such as artificial intelligence-powered chatbot ChatGPT a top priority, although Parliament taking the long-awaited step of giving the agency new fining and rulemaking authority would help it do even more, its chief recently told Law360.
The Attorney General’s Office seeks to understand how the facial network will affect citizens’ rights to privacy and liberty. As such, the letter requests information regarding Clearview AI use at the Vermont-Canada border and in the state. ” Clearview AI’s data collection methods come under scrutiny before.
Canada Ontario Court of Appeals held in R v. This power, when extended to individuals’ electronic devices, can give rise to a serious concern about their privacy and right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure. Pike on Friday that random electronic searches at Canadian borders are unconstitutional.
.” In recent months, many governments around the world have become concerned about TikTok’s security and data privacy issues. Last month, the US Congress held a hearing in which TikTok’s CEO Shou Chew testified regarding consumer privacy and data concerns. The post TikTok fined £12.7M
The Supreme Court of Canada ruled that Ontario Premier Doug Ford’s mandate letters to his cabinet fell under an exemption of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FIPPA) on Friday.
Kenya also demanded TikTok provide details on the effectiveness of age verification and content filtering, and implement additional specific Kenya privacy policies as a data controller and/or data processor. Early in 2023, Canada banned TikTok on government-issued mobile devices.
While Canada eviscerates the right to free speech and association , some are apparently holding firm on the privacy rights of accused felons to w arn homeowners not to post videos of thefts. The question is whether this is about the privacy interests of the thieves or the political interests of the police. Oh Canada.
The Federal Communications Commission said Wednesday it has inked an agreement with Canada'sprivacy regulator to share information and cooperate on enforcement actions to protect consumers' data.
In signing the law, Gianforte said: The Chinese Communist Party using TikTok to spy on Americans, violate their privacy, and collect their personal, private, and sensitive information is well-documented. Other countries have banned the app from government-issued devices, including countries such as Australia and Canada , as well as the EU.
On March 13, the US House of Representatives passed a bill that would force TikTok and its Chinese-owned parent company, ByteDance, to cease its Chinese-based operations following concerns over privacy protections for user data. In Canada, TikTok is already banned on government phones.
Robust privacy protections are critical to building the trust necessary for the digital economy to grow and prosper — but the gap in Canada'sprivacy legislation.
As privacy law reform legislation multiplies in Canada, each pursuing its own direction, around the world privacy law reform is also splintering through varied legislative developments.
The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) and Privacy Commissioner Angelene Falk found that Clearview AI breached Australia’s privacy laws through the covert collection of biometric information form the internet and then incorporating it into a facial recognition tool.
The IMF paper details the experiences of the six central banks at the frontier of CBDCs: Central Bank of The Bahamas , People’s Bank of China , Eastern Caribbean Central Bank , Banco Central del Uruguay , Sveriges Riksbank and Bank of Canada.
Earlier this month, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada ("OPC") released a summary of its key recommendations for a new federal private sector privacy law (the "Key Recommendations").
.” The process to appoint a Supreme Court Justice in Canada begins with a six-week application process. The committees will also hear from the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada and the IAB Chairperson on the selection process and the reasons for a specific nomination. president’s) nomination.
Regulation of data privacy may be changing in Canada, with the proposed creation of a new enforcement body with the power to impose very significant fines.
In July 2020, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (the "OPC"), along with its international counterparts, sent a letter to five of the largest video teleconferencing companies ("VTCs").
For privacy and security reasons we are withholding his name. Most of the legal programs were funded by the US and Canada, and in some projects by Germany through GIZ. JURIST EXCLUSIVE – The author is a law student in Kabul who also works in a local law office; he wrote this for JURIST late Sunday AFT. Today Kabul was taken.
In an effort to engage with customers on a deeper level, companies are increasingly investing time and resources into developing and improving their mobile applications.
While that has not happened in the United States, it has now happened in Canada. ” Judges should, the guidelines say, inform themselves about the use of security and privacy settings on social media. “Fairness issues may need to be considered by the judge should this happen.”
The Court of Appeal confirmed the Superior Court's landmark judgment dealing with the loss of personal information in Lamoureux c. 1 The class action filed by the plaintiff.
to Canada to specifically help convert internet browsers into right-fit clients for lawyers in family law, and has been used by both small boutique firms and family law groups within larger full-service national firms. For example, Clio Grow has been developed as a separate product to focus on intake and sales.
Do internet “stings” aimed at identifying child traffickers or possible terrorists threaten the balance between combating crime and protecting privacy? ” A slate of upcoming cases in Canada offers an opportunity to fine-tune the legal doctrine under which entrapment in the “virtual space” was permissible.
This, the legislators argue, violates Montana’s right to privacy. Whereas, Australia , Canada , Denmark , the EU , France , the Netherlands , New Zealand , and Norway only prohibit the app on government-issued devices. ” The proposed ban targets companies that facilitate the use of Tiktok within the state.
Several governments have recently imposed internal bans on TikTok, including the United States , Canada , Wisconsin and North Carolina , and the European Commission. The post Australia bans TikTok on Government devices appeared first on JURIST - News.
In August, Canada's Advisory Committee on Open Banking (the "Committee") released its final report (the "Final Report"), which provides the Committee's recommendations for how Canada should implement.
If passed, the Bill would significantly reform federal private-sector privacy law. On June 16, 2022, the federal government introduced Bill C-27, the Digital Charter Implementation Act, 2022 (Bill C-27 or Bill).
On September 22, 2021, Bill 64, An Act to modernize legislative provisions as regards the protection of personal information (the "Privacy Modernization Act" or the "Amended Act") received royal assent.
In this case, the last of the four privacy torts described in the Restatement of Torts (Second) was recognized in Ontario: publicity which places the plaintiff in a false light in the public eye.
Nearly 40 years after its decision in Krouse v Chrysler, the Court of Appeal for Ontario released a landmark decision recognizing a second privacy tort.
In today's digital age, there is increasing concern about individual privacy. Companies and organizations collect an immense amount of personal data, which increases.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content