Remove Case Management Remove Minnesota Remove Statute
article thumbnail

The 10 Legal Tech Trends that Defined 2021

LawSites

Also last year, the Minnesota Supreme Court approved a pilot project to permit “legal paraprofessionals” to provide legal services in certain matters.

Legal 145
article thumbnail

The 10 Legal Tech Trends that Defined 2021

LawSites

Also last year, the Minnesota Supreme Court approved a pilot project to permit “legal paraprofessionals” to provide legal services in certain matters.

Legal 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

December 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The companies filed their brief on November 16, arguing that the Fourth Circuit erred by concluding that it was limited to reviewing removal based on the federal-officer removal statute. the court continued the case management conference scheduled for December 16 to June 9, 2021. In Minnesota v. Chevron Corp. ,

Court 57
article thumbnail

January 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

1442, or the civil-rights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. The district court rejected eight grounds for removal, but the Fourth Circuit concluded its appellate jurisdiction was limited to determining whether the companies properly removed the case under the federal-officer removal statute. Minnesota v. 20-cv-1636 (D.

Court 52
article thumbnail

August 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The court also noted that states and localities “expressly maintain control over the local distribution of natural gas under related federal statutes” such as the Natural Gas Act. holding that the scope of appellate review of remand orders extended beyond review of removal based on the federal-officer removal statute. July 6, 2021).

Court 40