Case Management Minnesota Statute 
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
DECEMBER 11, 2020
The companies filed their brief on November 16, arguing that the Fourth Circuit erred by concluding that it was limited to reviewing removal based on the federal-officer removal statute. the court continued the case management conference scheduled for December 16 to June 9, 2021. In Minnesota v. Chevron Corp. ,
LawSites
DECEMBER 29, 2021
Also last year, the Minnesota Supreme Court approved a pilot project to permit “legal paraprofessionals” to provide legal services in certain matters.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
LawSites
DECEMBER 29, 2021
Also last year, the Minnesota Supreme Court approved a pilot project to permit “legal paraprofessionals” to provide legal services in certain matters.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
JANUARY 13, 2021
1442, or the civil-rights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. The district court rejected eight grounds for removal, but the Fourth Circuit concluded its appellate jurisdiction was limited to determining whether the companies properly removed the case under the federal-officer removal statute. Minnesota v. 20-cv-1636 (D.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
AUGUST 4, 2021
The court also noted that states and localities “expressly maintain control over the local distribution of natural gas under related federal statutes” such as the Natural Gas Act. holding that the scope of appellate review of remand orders extended beyond review of removal based on the federal-officer removal statute. July 6, 2021).
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
59 
Let's personalize your content