Constitutional Law Reporter

AUGUST 28, 2023

Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of state laws requiring corporations operating within their borders to consent to personal jurisdiction when they register to do business in those states. According to the Court, such laws do not offend the Constitution’s Due Process Clause. In Mallory v. Bauman , 571 U.S.

Court 52

Court Laws Cause of Action Constitutional Law 52

Constitutional Law Reporter

MARCH 9, 2021

S. _ (2021), the Supreme Court ruled that the Federal Tort Claims Act barred college student James King’s claims of police brutality. The Court unanimously held that the district court’s dismissal of King’s claims under the FTCA triggered the “judgment bar” in 28 U.S.C. In Brownback v. King ,592 U.

Court Rules 52

Court Rules Tort Court Cause of Action 52

Constitutional Law Reporter

APRIL 10, 2024

Supreme Court ruled that public officials may be held liable for their social media activity in certain circumstances. The District Court found that because Freed managed his Facebook page in his private capacity, and because only state action can give rise to liability under §1983, Lindke’s claim failed. In Lindke v.

Court 52

Court Cause of Action Government Court Rules 52

Constitutional Law Reporter

FEBRUARY 8, 2024

Supreme Court heard oral arguments in four cases this week. The two most closely watched involve whether the Court should overrule its landmark decision in Chevron v. The Court’s Chevron decision established a bedrock principle of administrative law. The cases before the Court, Relentless, Inc. 837 (1984).

Statute 52

Statute Cause of Action Entertainment Court 52

Constitutional Law Reporter

JUNE 1, 2023

Supreme Court held that death row inmate Rodney Reed did not wait too long to seek DNA testing of the evidence in his case. According to the Court majority, when a prisoner pursues state post-conviction DNA testing through the state-provided litigation process, the statute of limitations for a 42 U.S.C.

Statute 52

Statute Litigation Litigating Cause of Action 52

Constitutional Law Reporter

SEPTEMBER 23, 2024

Supreme Court held that a claim under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) does not accrue for purposes of 28 U.S.C. 2401(a) ’s default six-year statute of limitations until the plaintiff is injured by final agency action. The District Court dismissed the suit as time-barred under 28 U. In Corner Post, Inc.

Statute 52

Statute Cause of Action Court Constitutional Law 52

JonathanTurley

JANUARY 16, 2023

The Supreme Court has granted certiorari in a potentially major case on the free exercise of religion. The trial court and Third Circuit ruled for the Postal Service under Hardison. “Groff’s proposed accommodation of being exempted from Sunday work would cause an undue hardship. .”

Court 49

Court Cause of Action Divorce Constitutional Law 49

JonathanTurley

JULY 23, 2021

What is interesting is that the Chapter includes a ban on any constitutional, contractual, or regulatory lawsuit for losses under this ban. NO PRIVATE CAUSE OF ACTION. (a) ” An actual state boycott could raise serious constitutional questions in interfering with interstate commerce and free speech. In Reeves, Inc.

Cause of Action 59

Cause of Action Government Manufacturing Laws 59

Constitutional Law Reporter

APRIL 20, 2022

Supreme Court heard oral arguments in four cases last week, with Justice Clarence Thomas participating remotely after being discharged from the hospital. Other issues before the Court included the extent of Congress’ war powers under Article 1 of the U.S. Constitution. Constitution. ” In Circuit City Stores, Inc.

Cause of Action 52

Cause of Action Court Constitutional Law Contract 52

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 9, 2021

Free speech has always held a precarious position in Australia which does not have an equivalent to the First Amendment in guaranteeing free speech as a constitutional right. Despite this history, a new decision out of the High Court is still shocking in its implications for further attacks on free speech.

Tort 42

Tort Court Compensatory Damages Punitive Damages 42

JURIST

AUGUST 16, 2023

The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Tuesday reversed the dismissal of a lawsuit against the District of Columbia alleging that it selectively enforced its defacement ordinance against anti-abortion protesters but not Black Lives Matter (BLM) protesters in the summer of 2020.

Cause of Action 197

Cause of Action Court Constitutional Law Government 197

Constitutional Law Reporter

JUNE 17, 2022

Supreme Court held that the authority of a court to imply a cause of action under Bivens v. While the Court did not overrule Bivens , it did emphasize that recognizing a Bivens cause of action is “a disfavored judicial activity.”. Supreme Court’s Decision. . _ (2022), the U.S. In Bivens v.

Cause of Action 52

Cause of Action Court Tort Immigration 52

JURIST

MAY 26, 2023

McMaster responded to the judge’s ruling, writing, “We will continue fighting to protect the lives of the unborn in South Carolina and the constitutional law that protects them. I hope that the Supreme Court will take this matter up without delay.”

Cause of Action 104

Cause of Action Constitutional Law Court Laws 104

Constitutional Law Reporter

SEPTEMBER 27, 2021

Supreme Court recently declined to block enforcement of a Texas law that prohibits abortions after six weeks of pregnancy. The Court denied the application for injunctive relief in Whole Woman’s Health v. The Texas law at issue, S.B. The district court denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss the case.

Laws 52

Laws Court Cause of Action Constitutional Law 52

JonathanTurley

MAY 7, 2022

Former President Donald Trump achieved mixed results in courts this week. The court then found that the filing could not maintain a group libel theory. Lait (1952), a New York federal district court addressed a defamation claim arising from the publication of the book “U.S.A. We have previously discussed this tort theory.

Court 39

Court Tort Cause of Action Constitutional Law 39

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 23, 2020

This case pleads that everybody, even publicly elected officials and celebrities, is owed the right to sexual privacy and redress from our courts when they experience intimate partner violence.”. The use of emotional distress claims runs against the grain of various cases, including the Westboro decision of the Supreme Court in 2011.

Tort 55

Tort Cause of Action Court Constitutional Law 55