This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Further, the court has analogized spending clause legislation to a contract and has held that funding recipients are on notice that they are subject to those remedies traditionally available in suits for breach of contract. In Thursday’s ruling in Cummings v.
Section 1983 provides a cause of action against any person acting under color of state law who deprives a person of “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws” of the United States. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote for a seven-justice majority.
Among its arguments for rehearing, Sarepta argues there was no “clearly and affirmatively expressed” waiver of its statutory right to file IPR petitions as would be required under applicable Delaware contractlaw. We await the decision as to whether the petition for rehearing will be granted.
Specific Performance is a unique legal concept in Indian ContractLaw that allows you to enforce the exact terms of a contract. When a party breaches a contract, you’re not merely looking for financial compensation but the fulfillment of the original contract’s exact terms. So why does this matter?
And even after the Supreme Court’s virtual elimination of federal common lawcauses of action claims under state or foreign law remain possible, though they may entail complex choice-of-law issues. Samtleben: Paraguay: Choice of Law in international contracts. Unlike the Principles, however, Law No.
And that will be [a defense] to the cause of action. The distinction here appears to be technical in nature, driven by property and contractlaw. A secured creditor, such as Main Street in this case, obtains certain conditional rights that become actionable only upon the event of a default.
The article considers that the common law marriage might still serve a useful purpose in Australian private international law, and how it could better do so. Pitel, The statutory assertion of exclusive jurisdiction Statutes that create or codify causes of action sometimes contain jurisdiction provisions. Stephen G.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content