SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 28, 2024

Share In a major ruling, the Supreme Court on Friday cut back sharply on the power of federal agencies to interpret the laws they administer and ruled that courts should rely on their own interpretion of ambiguous laws. Kagan predicted that Friday’s ruling “will cause a massive shock to the legal system.”

Court 145

Court Statute Cause of Action Legal 145

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 8, 2023

Section 1983 provides a cause of action against any person acting under color of state law who deprives a person of “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws” of the United States. The court then applied its long-standing two-step analysis to conclude that FNHRA is enforceable through Section 1983.

Statute 102

Statute Court Contract Tort 102

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 28, 2022

United States is next in a protracted line of cases in which the court has considered whether statutory bars to causes of action are firm “jurisdictional” rules or instead more forgiving claims-processing rules. First, modern cases like Boechler require a clear statement for a statute of limitations to operate as jurisdictional.

Statute 99

Statute Cause of Action Government Court 99

At the Lectern

JULY 6, 2023

Victory Woodworks , the Supreme Court today holds that employers currently can’t be sued for failing to prevent the spread of COVID-19 to employees’ household members. Allowing liability “would impose an intolerable burden on employers and society in contravention of public policy,” the court says. In Kuciemba v.

Cause of Action 45

Cause of Action Tort Construction Court 45

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 2, 2022

Share This week we highlight cert petitions (and one original action ) that ask the Supreme Court to consider, among other things, whether New Jersey can withdraw from its Waterfront Commission Compact with New York concerning governance and law enforcement over the Port of New York and New Jersey. In New York v. However, the U.S.

Government 108

Government Statute Cause of Action Entertainment 108

LawSites

NOVEMBER 8, 2023

primary law library of cases, statutes, regulations, court rules and constitutions. The company said it will incorporate the legal research data into its core platform to create a marriage of factual development and legal analysis, allowing litigators to analyze fact patterns against the relevant law. “We

Legal Research 80

Legal Research Legal Legal eDiscovery 80

The Fashion Law

NOVEMBER 23, 2021

On the heels of the high fashion retailer and the magazine publisher pushing back against the models’ claims in respective motions to dismiss, and a New York federal court stripping down the case, Condé Nast is trying to get the rest of the case – including the plaintiffs’ right of publicity and unjust enrichment claims – tossed out. .

Statute 131

Statute Punitive Damages Cause of Action Laws 131

At the Lectern

JULY 26, 2021

Tri-Modal Distribution Services , the Supreme Court today interprets the statute of limitations for employment harassment cases to give certain plaintiffs more leeway to bring their lawsuits, and it protects many unsuccessful plaintiffs from paying defendants’ appellate costs.

Statute 40

Statute Cause of Action Court Litigating 40

Patently O

MARCH 21, 2021

The pending Supreme Court case of Warsaw v. There are two different statutes regarding Federal Court exclusive jurisdiction over patent cases. 1338(a) provides Federal district courts with “original jurisdiction of any civil action arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents.” ” Id.

Contract 100

Contract Statute Court Cause of Action 100

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 9, 2021

Share This week we highlight cert petitions that ask the Supreme Court to consider, among other things, the viability of certain types of disability-based claims under three federal statutes. courts of appeals are “nearly evenly divided” on this issue, the county asks for the justices’ review. The en banc U.S. Exby-Stolley.

Statute 112

Statute Cause of Action Finance Court 112

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 25, 2022

Share On Wednesday, the Supreme Court considered whether a violation of Miranda v. Tekoh may create a seismic shift in American constitutional criminal procedure, as the court’s resolution of the lawsuit here could take an axe to the legal and cultural oak known as Miranda warnings. Stated thusly? Be warned: It is not.

Cause of Action 138

Cause of Action Court Litigating Litigation 138

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 28, 2024

Share The court ruled on Thursday that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s routine practice of imposing fines in its administrative proceedings, used to penalize securities fraud, violates the Seventh Amendment “right of trial by jury” in all “suits at common law.”

Government 143

Government Immigration Cause of Action Litigating 143

FDA Law

JULY 8, 2024

By Riëtte van Laack & JP Ellison — On Thursday, the 27 th of June, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Securities and Exchange Commission v. The first question in the Court’s analysis was whether the claim that the SEC brought is a “suit at common law,” i.e., if the case is legal in nature. Jarkesy.

Court Rules 59

Court Rules Cause of Action Court Statute 59

Conflict of Laws

MAY 31, 2021

In Nigerian judicial parlance, we have become accustomed to the principle that the issue of jurisdiction can be raised at any time, even at the Nigerian Supreme Court – the highest court of the land – for the first time. [1] On this basis the defendant/appellant argued that the court of Yobe State had exclusive jurisdiction.

Contract 98

Contract Cause of Action Court Laws 98

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 19, 2022

Arizona is one of the most significant Supreme Court decisions in American criminal procedure. Generally, if the police obtain a suspect’s statement in violation of Miranda , the government cannot use that statement against the defendant in court. Tekoh presents the court with that question. Share Miranda v.

Court 105

Court Government Lawyers Lawyer 105

Patently O

MARCH 25, 2021

Montana 8th Judicial District ( Supreme Court 2021 ). The Supreme Court has sided with Gullett’s estate — finding that the 14th Amendment does not prohibit this case from moving forward. With Specific Jurisdiction , the Court’s recent decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. Superior Court of Cal.,

Court 63

Court Cause of Action Manufacturing Litigating 63

JayS.Rothman&Associates

MAY 17, 2023

For example, courts have held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees from discrimination on the basis of their associates’ race, gender, religion, and/or national origin. Iona College, a federal appellate court explained the rationale for reading associational discrimination into Title VII. 12112(b)(4).

Prima Facie Case 96

Prima Facie Case Cause of Action Legal Legal 96

Patently O

OCTOBER 11, 2021

In February 2021, US Inventor and others collectively sued the USPTO asking the court to order the USPTO to issue rulemaking regarding discretionary considerations at the institution stage of AIA Trials. Abuse of Discretion : Courts and administrators are often given discretionary authority to make decisions. ” 5 U.S.C.

Statute 80

Statute Cause of Action Court Laws 80

Day on Torts

APRIL 15, 2022

A provision of the GTLA allowing for the recovery of attorney’s fees by a governmental employee who was the prevailing party in a GTLA suit was constitutional and did not deprive plaintiff of her right to access the courts. The trial court also found alternative grounds for dismissal as to some defendants, including Ms. In Taylor v.

Statute 59

Statute Attorney Cause of Action Litigating 59

Patently O

MARCH 18, 2024

by Dennis Crouch In a recent nonprecedential decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court ruling ordering the correction of inventorship for U.S. The district court agreed, finding their contributions were significant to the conception of the claimed invention. The inventorship correction statute – 35 U.S.C. §

Statute 59

Statute Cause of Action Court Rules Litigating 59

The IP Law Blog

JANUARY 11, 2024

2255, which allows victims of child pornography to bring a civil cause of action. The district court agreed with the defendants and dismissed the complaint with prejudice. Mr. Elden appealed that dismissal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal. Days before Christmas 2023, the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion in Elden v.

Personal Injury 62

Personal Injury Statute Cause of Action Criminal Law 62

SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 7, 2021

Similar suits have been brought against other universities, but the lower courts dismissed this one. That problem, in turn, would present defendants with a hydraulic pressure to settle that in practice would deprive them of any fair chance to rebut the allegations in court. What is a court supposed to do with a claim like that?”

Litigating 107

Litigating Litigation Cause of Action Court 107

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 17, 2023

Share The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. This week, we highlight cert petitions that ask the court to consider, among other things, at what stage of litigation the ministerial exception should come into play. Both a federal district court and the U.S.

Cause of Action 89

Cause of Action Court Litigating Litigation 89

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 15, 2023

Ignoring the threshold questions on which the court had not granted review and applying a longstanding clear-statement rule, a near-unanimous court ruled in favor of Puerto Rico’s financial oversight board. One involves “a statute [that] says in so many words that it is stripping immunity from a sovereign entity.”

Statute 55

Statute Finance Government Cause of Action 55

Conflict of Laws

JUNE 28, 2023

It is cross-posted at Transnational Litigation Blog. Supreme Court yesterday upheld the constitutionality of Pennsylvania’s corporate registration statute, even though it requires out-of-state corporations registering to do business within the state to consent to all-purpose (general) personal jurisdiction. Washington (1945).

Court 40

Court Statute Cause of Action Contract 40

Conflict of Laws

MAY 18, 2023

The UK Supreme Court ruled that the cause of action in the aftermath of the 2011 Bonga offshore oil spill accrued at the moment when the oil reached the shore. The relevant facts are summarized by the UK Supreme Court as follows at [6] and [7]: (…) The Bonga oil field is located approximately 120 km off the coast of Nigeria.

Cause of Action 40

Cause of Action Court Tort Civil Law 40

Day on Torts

JANUARY 11, 2021

The trial court granted the motion to dismiss, relying in part on the Public Duty Doctrine, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. If the GTLA removes immunity, then the common law rule of immunity under the Public Duty Doctrine provides an additional layer of defense and is the next level of inquiry for the court.

Cause of Action 59

Cause of Action Tort Court Statute 59

At the Lectern

JULY 28, 2022

At the Supreme Court’s conference yesterday, after which Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye announced her retirement, actions of note included: Government immunity. The court granted review in County of Santa Clara v. The court granted-and-held in In re Z.T. The court granted review in Cynosure, LLC v.

Government 49

Government Court Contract Cause of Action 49

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

MAY 23, 2018

Climate change nuisance litigation is entering a new and dynamic phase. Alsup in the federal district court in San Francisco will hear oral argument on motions to dismiss filed in City of Oakland v. As I’ve noted in an earlier blog looking at preliminary issues in these cases , the Supreme Court found in AEP v. BP P.L.C. ,

Litigating 52

Litigating Litigation Tort Cause of Action 52

Conflict of Laws

JANUARY 10, 2022

Given the power of Big Tech Companies, their enormous financial resources, cross-jurisdictional reach and their global impact on users’ privacy, there are two main litigation challenges for successfully bringing a privacy claim against Big Tech. 3] Secondly, the challenge is how to finance mass claims, involving millions of affected users.

Tort 75

Tort Litigating Litigation Finance 75

Conflict of Laws

NOVEMBER 22, 2023

courts cannot exercise personal jurisdiction and thus cannot apply U.S. Congress clearly intended its cause of action for trafficking in confiscated property to discourage non-U.S. Congress clearly intended its cause of action for trafficking in confiscated property to discourage non-U.S. This is true. Second, U.S.

Statute 59

Statute Criminal Law Laws Court 59

Conflict of Laws

JANUARY 15, 2023

The Federal Court Legislation Amendment Rules 2022 (Cth) (‘Amendment Rules’) came into force on 13 January 2023. Among other things, they amend the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) (‘FCR’) by repealing division 10.4, The previous approach to service outside Australia in the Federal Court.

Court 40

Court Prima Facie Case Statute Cause of Action 40

Strictly Business

OCTOBER 30, 2017

Rather, US law has relied mostly on private litigation and government enforcement actions under laws that predated the modern digital era. Additionally, there are a number of federal statutes that apply to specific business activities that implicate data privacy issues.

Laws 52

Laws Government Litigating Litigation 52

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

DECEMBER 11, 2020

Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. Federal Court Found Flaws in New Climate Change Analysis for Wyoming Oil and Gas Leases. and non-U.S. FEATURED CASE.

Court 59

Court Government Litigating Litigation 59

LexForti

APRIL 30, 2021

Also, the argument that the NCLAT is an appellate tribunal which is common to three statutes, under one of which, viz., Merely because appeals under different statutes are sent to one appellate tribunal would make no difference to the position in law. UOI [4], the Apex Court emphasized and reiterated its annotation in B.K.

Cause of Action 52

Cause of Action Court Statute Education 52

Conflict of Laws

APRIL 1, 2025

The conferences topic, characterisation, is the process for identifying the nature or category of a particular cause of action (for instance contractual, tortious, proprietary, corporate, matrimonial), so that the correct connecting factor can be employed which then points to the applicable law or to the competent court.

Laws 45

Laws Family Law Contract Legal 45

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 28, 2023

is whether and to what extent the federal trademark statute, known as the Lanham Act, applies to infringing conduct that takes place outside the United States. In 1952, the court held in Steele v. Share The issue presented in Abitron Austria GmbH v. Hetronic International, Inc. , Hetronic, a U.S. Bulova Watch Co.

Statute 115

Statute Cause of Action Court Government 115