Cause of Action Court Maryland 
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
MAY 12, 2023
Supreme Court declined to hear a petition on whether the climate liability cases should be heard in state or federal court. As a result, 11 cases will be remanded to state court to move towards motions to dismiss, discovery, and trial. Several factors led to the Supreme Court’s decision. On April 24, the U.S.
Patently O
MARCH 16, 2024
This recent decision from the Supreme Court case grapples with the issue of when a public official’s social media activity constitutes state action for purposes of a First Amendment claim under 42 U.S.C. by Dennis Crouch Lindke v. Freed, 601 U.S. 2024) 22-611_ap6c. ” 42 U.S.C. ” 42 U.S.C. Edmondson Oil Co.,
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
DECEMBER 11, 2020
Federal Court Found Flaws in New Climate Change Analysis for Wyoming Oil and Gas Leases. The federal district court for the District of Columbia ruled that the U.S. Second, the court concluded that BLM should have calculated and considered total greenhouse emissions, instead of merely relying on comparisons of yearly emission rates.
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 17, 2025
Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has relisted for its upcoming conference. First, as I pledged in my last post , I am only too happy to eat crow after predicting that the court would not take one-time relist Villarreal v. A short explanation of relists is available here. But the U.S.
At the Lectern
JULY 14, 2022
At the Supreme Court’s conference yesterday, a double one, actions of note included: Lemon Law. The court granted review in Rodriguez v. The appellate court concluded the definition is “a catchall for sales of essentially new vehicles where the applicable warranty was issued with the sale.” FCA US, LLC.
JonathanTurley
OCTOBER 31, 2021
A tort action for intentional infliction of emotional distress is likely to fail. There must be not just outrageous conduct but conduct intended to cause severe emotional distress. Courts regularly exclude injuries associated with the exercise of free speech or artistic expression. Again, the court agreed.
JonathanTurley
OCTOBER 30, 2022
A tort action for intentional infliction of emotional distress is likely to fail. There must be not just outrageous conduct but conduct intended to cause severe emotional distress. Courts regularly exclude injuries associated with the exercise of free speech or artistic expression. Again, the court agreed.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
64 
Let's personalize your content