Cause of Action Court Pennsylvania 
JURIST
FEBRUARY 9, 2024
In a unanimous slip opinion, the US Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) waives sovereign immunity and that the federal government can be liable for incorrect debt reporting that damages credit scores. Justice Neil Gorsuch authored the opinion of the court.
Constitutional Law Reporter
AUGUST 28, 2023
Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of state laws requiring corporations operating within their borders to consent to personal jurisdiction when they register to do business in those states. According to the Court, such laws do not offend the Constitution’s Due Process Clause. Supreme Court’s Decision The Supreme Court reversed.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JURIST
DECEMBER 17, 2020
A judge for the US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama dismissed a lawsuit Tuesday challenging the state’s COVID-19 mask mandate. The court found that the complaint was a “shotgun complaint.” Parties, causes of action, injuries, causation, and redressability should be specific and match.
Conflict of Laws
JUNE 28, 2023
Supreme Court yesterday upheld the constitutionality of Pennsylvania’s corporate registration statute, even though it requires out-of-state corporations registering to do business within the state to consent to all-purpose (general) personal jurisdiction. courts over disputes that arise in other countries.
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 2, 2022
Share This week we highlight cert petitions (and one original action ) that ask the Supreme Court to consider, among other things, whether New Jersey can withdraw from its Waterfront Commission Compact with New York concerning governance and law enforcement over the Port of New York and New Jersey. In New York v. However, the U.S.
JonathanTurley
OCTOBER 30, 2022
There must be not just outrageous conduct but conduct intended to cause severe emotional distress. Courts regularly exclude injuries associated with the exercise of free speech or artistic expression. Pennsylvania is a comparative negligence state so contributory negligence by the plaintiffs would not be a bar to recovery.
JonathanTurley
OCTOBER 31, 2021
There must be not just outrageous conduct but conduct intended to cause severe emotional distress. Courts regularly exclude injuries associated with the exercise of free speech or artistic expression. Pennsylvania is a comparative negligence state so contributory negligence by the plaintiffs would not be a bar to recovery.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
245 
Let's personalize your content