Cause of Action District of Columbia Litigation Statute 
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 28, 2024
Under that doctrine, if Congress has not directly addressed the question at the center of a dispute, a court was required to uphold the agency’s interpretation of the statute as long as it was reasonable. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.) This article was originally published at Howe on the Court.
SCOTUSBlog
JANUARY 16, 2022
Her heirs have been litigating for more than 15 years over rights to the painting, an Impressionist masterpiece once thought to be lost. Four of them – the 2nd, 5th, 6th, and District of Columbia Circuits – have answered in the affirmative. But that’s for cases brought under diversity jurisdiction. Does Klaxon apply?
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
DECEMBER 11, 2020
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. The federal district court for the District of Columbia ruled that the U.S. and non-U.S. FEATURED CASE.
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 20, 2024
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit held that as a former employee, Stanley lacked a cause of action under the ADA. But its suit named Dewberry Group, not the affiliates, as a defendant, and the parties litigated only the liability of Dewberry Group itself. In Stanley v. rescheduled before the Mar. Kentucky ex rel.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
NOVEMBER 16, 2020
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. District of Columbia v. By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Roati. and non-U.S. Exxon Mobil Corp. , Delaware v.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
JANUARY 13, 2021
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. 1442, or the civil-rights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. HERE ARE RECENT ADDITIONS TO THE INTERNATIONAL CLIMATE LITIGATION CHART.
SCOTUSBlog
JANUARY 16, 2024
Justice John Paul Stevens set out a two-part test for courts to review an agency’s interpretation of a statute it administers. If it has not, the court must uphold the agency’s interpretation of the statute as long as it is reasonable. In the Supreme Court, the fisheries are represented by former U.S.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
.png)
145 
Let's personalize your content